Videos tagged with 10th Circuit

This video from Guns & Gadgets details a significant legal victory for 2nd Amendment rights, where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against New Mexico's mandatory seven-day firearm waiting period (HB 129). The court found the law likely violates the 2nd Amendment, referencing the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and the lack of historical tradition for such restrictions. This ruling impacts Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming, and could serve as a precedent for similar challenges nationwide.

This video details a significant legal victory where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it likely violates the Second Amendment. The decision sets precedent for states within the 10th Circuit's jurisdiction and highlights the ongoing legal battles over firearm restrictions. The host emphasizes that delaying a right is akin to denying it, framing waiting periods as an infringement on law-abiding citizens.

This video analyzes the US v. Morgan case, which challenges machine gun bans under the Second Amendment. It details how the 10th Circuit upheld restrictions, contrasting with a district court's ruling. The case is now before the Supreme Court, seeking clarification on which arms are protected by the Second Amendment and how precedent like Heller and Bruen applies to modern firearms.

This video analyzes a significant 10th Circuit ruling in United States v. Harrison, which challenges the prohibition of firearm possession by marijuana users. The court's new rule of law suggests that individuals can be disarmed based on a perceived risk of future danger, rather than actual past actions, potentially leading to broad preemptive disarmament. The case has been sent back to the trial court for further findings on whether non-intoxicated marijuana users pose such a risk.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has preliminarily enjoined New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases in Ortega v. Gisham. The court ruled that the waiting period infringes upon the Second Amendment by restricting the right to acquire firearms, which is a necessary predicate to keeping and bearing them. This decision emphasizes that such restrictions burden fundamental rights and lack historical justification.

This video provides a legal analysis of the 10th Circuit's ruling striking down New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases. The ruling, in Ortega v. Gisham, found the waiting period to be an undue burden on Second Amendment rights, citing its lack of historical tradition and its infringement on lawful acquisition. The analysis highlights how this decision aligns with recent Supreme Court interpretations of Second Amendment rights.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down New Mexico's 7-day statutory waiting period for firearm purchases in Ortega v. Luhan Gisham. The court ruled that such waiting periods burden the Second Amendment right to acquire firearms and are not historically analogous to permissible regulations. This decision has significant implications for similar laws in other states, including Colorado.

This video provides an expert analysis of recent federal court decisions impacting Second Amendment rights concerning machine gun possession. It details the legal arguments in cases like United States v. Morgan and United States v. Brown, highlighting how lower courts are interpreting landmark rulings such as Heller and Bruen. The discussion covers the government's arguments, judicial interpretations of 'bearable arms,' and the ongoing appeals process, offering insights into the evolving legal landscape for gun owners.

This video provides an expert analysis of a significant federal court ruling that found federal laws prohibiting machine gun possession unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. The speaker, an expert in firearms law, details the legal arguments, key cases like US vs. Morgan and US vs. Brown, and the government's appeals, highlighting the ongoing legal battles over firearm rights.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the significant legal case Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Polis concerning Colorado's SB 23-169. The discussion highlights how age-based firearm purchase restrictions are being interpreted under the 'presumptively lawful' doctrine established in Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, potentially setting a dangerous precedent that could impact gun ownership rights nationwide by allowing broad state regulation of commercial firearm sales and purchases.

A district court in Kansas dismissed a machine gun possession charge based on Second Amendment grounds, citing the Bruen decision's requirement for historical analogues. The court found machine guns to be 'bearable arms' and ruled the government failed to demonstrate a historical tradition justifying their ban. This ruling, while at the district level, represents a significant potential challenge to the National Firearms Act (NFA).

This video discusses recent legal and regulatory developments impacting firearm ownership and FFL holders. It highlights a judge's criticism of the ATF's heavy-handed approach in revoking an FFL and details an incident where an ATF inspector allegedly seized documents from a gun shop without a warrant. The segment also covers a legal victory in Colorado preventing the enforcement of a law restricting firearm purchases for adults under 21.