Videos tagged with 10th Circuit

This video analyzes the US v. Brown machine gun case and the DOJ's recent filing in the 5th Circuit. The Trump DOJ is attempting to have the case dismissed based on new Supreme Court precedent and the denial of certiorari in US v. Morgan. The discussion highlights the conflicting judicial interpretations of machine gun bans under the Bruen framework and the potential implications for federal firearm regulation.

This video from Copper Jacket TV discusses a significant legal victory where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it likely violates the Second Amendment. The host, Will, explains the legal philosophy behind the ruling, emphasizing that delayed rights are denied rights and that waiting periods unfairly target law-abiding citizens. The decision sets a precedent for states within the 10th Circuit's jurisdiction and highlights a potential circuit split that could lead to Supreme Court review.

This video discusses a recent, unanimous federal court decision by the US Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, concerning machine gun bans and their impact on the Second Amendment. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, breaks down the legal implications of the ruling. The channel, Four Boxes Diner, is recognized for its analysis of Second Amendment rights and constitutional law, with the host being a published author and frequent media guest.

This video discusses a significant ruling from the 10th Circuit in the case of United States v. Harrison, which challenges federal prohibitions on marijuana users possessing firearms. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains how a 3-judge panel has sent the case back to the District Court with a ruling he deems "incredibly dangerous." The ruling, if upheld, could lead to arbitrary disarmament based on political decisions. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on this critical issue affecting Second Amendment rights and provides links to the court's ruling and resources from Washington Gun Law.

This video announces a significant legal victory for the Second Amendment, as the 10th Circuit Court has ruled New Mexico's firearm purchase waiting period unconstitutional. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, discusses the implications of this ruling. The channel, Four Boxes Diner, is recognized for its commitment to analyzing Bill of Rights issues and providing information for gun owners and those who defend liberty.

This video discusses the 10th Circuit Court striking down New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases. The description includes various affiliate links for sponsors like Blackout Coffee Company, Attorneys On Retainer, PSA, My Patriot Supply, and others, along with social media links and support options like Patreon and SubscribeStar.

This video discusses a significant legal development where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that New Mexico's firearm waiting period is likely unconstitutional. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, explains the court's decision in Ortega v. Lujan Grisham, highlighting how the three-judge panel rejected the state's arguments. The ruling has potential implications for similar laws in other states, and viewers are encouraged to educate themselves on their Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a significant federal court ruling in the 10th Circuit that found federal laws prohibiting machine gun possession to be a violation of the Second Amendment, citing the Bruen decision. The case, US v. Morgan, challenged charges related to possessing an AR-15 converted to a machine gun and a Glock switch. The court rejected government arguments based on Heller dicta, stating that machine guns are 'bearable arms' covered by the amendment's plain text. The presenter also promotes a 'Legal Survival Guide' to help gun owners avoid legal pitfalls.

This video discusses a significant Second Amendment case where a Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding a machine gun ban. Following a lower court's ruling that machine guns are protected arms, the 10th Circuit is now reviewing the case. The analysis is presented by Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and recognized Second Amendment scholar, who also hosts the Four Boxes Diner 2A channel. The discussion touches upon the broader implications for gun rights and the ongoing legal battles surrounding firearm ownership in the United States.

This expert analysis dissects the Supreme Court's decision impacting machine gun possession laws, specifically in the context of the US v. Morgan case. It critically examines the DOJ's arguments against the Second Amendment protection for machine guns, highlighting the legal precedents and historical analogues used by the courts. The content emphasizes the implications for current and future firearm rights litigation.

This video analyzes a recent ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit regarding a Second Amendment challenge to Colorado's ban on selling firearms to 18-20 year olds. The court ruled against the challenge, a decision the host, constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, strongly disagrees with. The discussion covers the case background, legal arguments, and what "the people" encompasses in the context of the Second Amendment. Smith argues the judges made significant errors and that the government failed to meet its burden of proof. The video touches on the broader implications for gun rights and what may happen next, offering analysis from the "Four Boxes Diner" perspective.

This YouTube video discusses a significant Second Amendment court case where the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit heard oral arguments regarding New Mexico's "sensitive places" gun ban, specifically concerning firearms in parks and playgrounds. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith from Four Boxes Diner provides analysis, covering the case background, key arguments, potential implications for the burden of proof on the government, and the historical tradition of firearms regulation. The discussion also touches upon potential First Amendment infringements related to these restrictions.