This video discusses how legal arguments are being made in response to the Smith & Wesson v. Mexico ruling, specifically focusing on Justice Kagan's statement about AR-15s, AK-47s, and .50 caliber rifles being in common use. The discussion highlights the legal concept of 'dicta' and how opposing counsel attempts to dismiss such statements as non-binding. It examines responses filed in cases like NAGR v. Lamont and RMGO v. Town of Superior, where proponents of civilian disarmament argue that statements about firearms in common use are dicta and irrelevant to Second Amendment protections.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
