Videos tagged with 922G1

This video features Steven Lieberman, an attorney, discussing the US v. Cherry case in Illinois, which challenges the constitutionality of 922G1 (felon in possession laws) under the Bruen decision. The ruling by Judge Yendel, while not binding, is persuasive and suggests that historical precedent for disarming felons is lacking, potentially impacting future Second Amendment litigation. The discussion highlights the complexities of 'status crimes' and the ongoing legal battles over firearm rights for individuals with past convictions.

This expert legal analysis from Armed Scholar breaks down the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Jones v. Hendrix. The ruling clarifies the application of 28 USC § 2255 and the conditions under which a federal inmate can file a second or successive motion to challenge a conviction, particularly concerning firearm possession laws like 922G1. The decision emphasizes procedural limitations while leaving open avenues for constitutional challenges.