Videos tagged with Andrew Cuomo

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the NRA in NRA v. Vullo, finding that former NY DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo is protected by qualified immunity. The court determined that while the NRA plausibly alleged a First Amendment claim regarding pressure on insurance companies, the law was not clearly established at the time of the conduct to overcome Vullo's qualified immunity defense. This decision means the lawsuit against Vullo cannot proceed, though the NRA may seek further review.

This video discusses the New York City mayoral election, focusing on the presumed Democratic candidate, Zoran Mom Donnie, a self-proclaimed socialist. The speaker criticizes Mom Donnie's platform, which includes policies like a $30 minimum wage, rent freezes, tax hikes, and advocating for banning all guns. The video also touches on the Republican candidate, Curtis Sliwa, and the perceived lack of viable pro-gun candidates in the city. The speaker expresses concern that Mom Donnie's policies could lead to an exodus of businesses and residents, a decline in public safety, and further restrictions on firearm ownership.

This video, presented by William Kirk, an expert legal professional and President of Washington Gun Law, provides an authoritative analysis of the critical lawsuit Mexico v. Smith & Wesson. The case, currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, poses a significant threat to the entire firearms industry by challenging the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The speaker details the arguments, the potential consequences of 'lawfare,' and the broader political context of using litigation to enact policy.

This video details the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in NRA v. Vullo, a landmark case concerning the weaponization of regulatory power against gun rights organizations. It explains how New York's Department of Financial Services, under Superintendent Marie Vullo, attempted to coerce financial institutions into severing ties with the NRA and other gun-promoting groups. The ruling affirmed that such actions violate the First Amendment by chilling protected speech and engaging in unconstitutional retaliation.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 9-0 ruling in NRA v. Vullo. It explains how the ruling protects First Amendment rights by preventing government officials from using state power to coerce third parties into suppressing disfavored speech, specifically in the context of gun rights advocacy. The analysis highlights the implications for future cases involving government overreach against political opponents.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case NRA v. Vullo, focusing on allegations that New York state officials, under Governor Andrew Cuomo, used regulatory power to coerce financial institutions into cutting ties with the NRA. The core of the argument centers on whether this constitutes a First Amendment violation of free speech and viewpoint discrimination. The discussion highlights the NRA's claim that threats were used over persuasion, while the state argued it was enforcing the law due to the NRA's alleged illegal conduct.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, critically analyzing New York's Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA) of 2022. Kirk details how the state is shifting background checks for firearms and ammunition from the federal FBI NICS system to the New York State Police, raising concerns about processing delays, data security, and the potential for a gun registry. He argues these measures, particularly the registry, may violate federal law, specifically the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986.

This video, from the Official NRA YouTube Channel, discusses the legal and political efforts by New York State, under former Governor Andrew Cuomo, to financially pressure and potentially shut down the National Rifle Association (NRA). It highlights how regulatory actions, including urging banks and insurers to sever ties with the NRA, are viewed as an attack on the organization's First Amendment rights to advocate for the Second Amendment. The video references legal challenges brought by the NRA and commentary from organizations like the ACLU, ultimately touching upon a court's decision that allowed New York's actions, citing corporate social responsibility. The NRA asserts its role as a defender of Second Amendment rights and civil liberties.

This video discusses New York Governor Kathy Hochul's decision to revoke a memorandum that had paused the implementation of the SAFE Act's ammunition background check provision. The description highlights that background checks are now required, but the state currently lacks the necessary process and infrastructure to facilitate them. The video also includes promotional links for USCCA, gold purchases, and the creator's social media and merchandise.

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging New York's Public Nuisance Liability Law, which aimed to allow private citizens to sue gun manufacturers for criminal misuse of firearms. This ruling, seen by some as potentially opening the door for more such lawsuits, upholds the constitutionality of the state law, despite arguments that it violates the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) plans to appeal this decision.

This video explains the 'law fair' strategy employed by anti-gun groups to target the firearms industry through lawsuits. The speaker details how these legal actions aim to financially drain gun manufacturers and distributors, even if the lawsuits are ultimately lost. It highlights key legal precedents like the Betamax case and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), while also discussing how these protections are being challenged in certain jurisdictions.

This video details a significant lawsuit filed by major firearms manufacturers against New York's new public nuisance liability law. The law, signed by Andrew Cuomo, aims to hold gun makers responsible for criminal misuse of their products, circumventing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). Fifteen prominent industry groups are plaintiffs, arguing the law is unconstitutional and could set a dangerous precedent nationwide. The speaker emphasizes the importance of vigilance and advocacy for Second Amendment rights.