Videos tagged with Brad Hinshelwood

This video details the Gun Owners of America's (GOA) legal challenge against the federal bump stock ban, arguing before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The core of the argument revolves around the statutory definition of a machine gun and whether a bump stock, by itself, converts a semi-automatic firearm into one. GOA's attorney, Rob Olson, presented a hypothetical contrasting a bump-stock-equipped AR-15 with a true machine gun, emphasizing the human action required for increased rate of fire. The DOJ's attorney, Brad Hinshelwood, contended that the device facilitates a continuous cycle of fire. The discussion also touches upon the ATF's shifting interpretations and the potential implications for firearm legality.