Videos tagged with Bumpstock Ban

This video discusses the 'Trump Slump 2.0,' a phenomenon where gun sales decline due to a perceived reduction in the threat of new gun control legislation following a Republican presidential victory. The speaker argues that this economic downturn in the firearms industry is linked to a decrease in political activism among gun owners, urging viewers to remain engaged in defending Second Amendment rights regardless of the political climate.

This video discusses the critical US Supreme Court case, Lesh v. United States, and its implications for the Second Amendment. The case challenges the 'petty offense' exception to the Sixth Amendment's right to a jury trial, arguing for an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and member of the US Supreme Court bar, emphasizes that upholding originalism in cases like this is crucial for the consistent application of all constitutional rights, including the Second Amendment.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) highlights ten significant victories in 2024 for gun rights. Key wins include securing an injunction against the ATF's 'Engaged in the Business' rule, the Supreme Court striking down the bumpstock ban in Garland v. Cargill, and the repeal of an unconstitutional veteran gun ban. GOA also celebrated a historic ATF budget cut, state-level legislative successes like constitutional carry in two new states, and a lawsuit that led New York City to issue out-of-state permits.

This video details the legal battle between Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the ATF/DOJ regarding attorney fees following the successful challenge to the bump stock ban. GOA argues the ATF's position was not substantially justified, citing factual misrepresentations about bump stock operation, and is seeking attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The discussion also highlights the significant difference between standard EAJA hourly rates and the rates sought by GOA's legal team, comparing them to rates of prominent legal figures.

This video discusses the Department of Justice's (DOJ) opposition to paying attorney's fees for Gun Owners of America (GOA) and other plaintiffs who successfully challenged the federal bumpstock ban. The DOJ argues their litigation position was 'substantially justified' under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), despite losing at the Supreme Court. The speaker highlights the low statutory rate of $125/hour proposed by the DOJ for these attorneys, contrasting it with market rates for top legal professionals, and emphasizes the importance of private donations to Second Amendment organizations.

This video discusses the implications of Donald Trump's 2024 election victory on Second Amendment rights. The speaker, Eric from Iraqveteran8888, analyzes the potential impact of Trump's presidency and JD Vance's vice presidency on gun legislation, judicial appointments, and the future of gun rights organizations. The discussion touches on past Second Amendment transgressions by Trump, the role of organizations like Gun Owners of America, and the potential for legislative changes, including the repeal of the NFA and the push for national carry reciprocity.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) outlines their strategy for protecting Second Amendment rights, focusing on political action and holding elected officials accountable. It details GOA's plans to work with a potential Trump administration to repeal Biden-era gun control measures, including the pistol brace rule and zero tolerance policies for FFLs. The organization also emphasizes the importance of grassroots engagement and continued lobbying efforts in Congress.

This video features legal expert Paul Clement discussing two significant Second Amendment-adjacent Supreme Court cases: United States v. Rahimi and Garland v. Cargill. Clement, a former Solicitor General, analyzes how the Rahimi case, concerning domestic violence restraining orders and firearm possession, was decided based on historical tradition, and how the Cargill case addressed the ATF's authority to ban bump stocks via regulation rather than legislation. The discussion highlights the evolving landscape of Second Amendment litigation and administrative law.

This video critically examines the Second Amendment record of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, arguing he has consistently supported anti-gun legislation. It details his voting history in Congress and his actions as governor, including signing universal background checks, red flag laws, and bans on certain firearm accessories. The content highlights concerns from gun rights organizations regarding potential gun confiscation and restrictions on lawful firearm ownership.

This video analyzes Kyle Rittenhouse's criticism of Donald Trump's stance on the Second Amendment, contrasting it with Kamala Harris's policies. It delves into Trump's past actions, including supporting red flag laws and the bumpstock ban, while also highlighting his appointments of conservative judges and keeping gun stores open during the pandemic. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unwavering support for gun rights and compares Trump's record to those of past presidents like George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan.

This video speculates on why gun control was absent from a presidential debate, suggesting it's a losing topic for both candidates due to past policy missteps and base limitations. It argues that recent legal victories for gun owners, like overturned bumpstock and brace rulings, and the erosion of ATF interpretive power, represent quiet gains. The speaker also introduces the Hegelian dialectic as a framework for understanding how cultural shifts, particularly towards gun control, are engineered, and emphasizes the growing importance of local elections and the impact of deep fakes on perceived reality.

This video from Guns & Gadgets provides an urgent call to action regarding a potential bumpstock ban being pushed by anti-gun senators. It details the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the previous ban, emphasizing the ATF's overreach and the distinction between bumpstocks and true automatic fire. The speaker outlines two primary actions for viewers: contacting senators to vote against the ban and registering to vote to counter anti-gun politicians. Additionally, it addresses potential YouTube policy changes affecting gun channels and encourages viewer support.