Videos tagged with Carrying Firearms

The speaker discusses his personal philosophy on carrying firearms, specifically 1911 pistols. He owns approximately 15 1911s and generally believes one should carry the most capable firearm they own, regardless of price. However, he notes an exception: if two firearms are functionally identical and shoot the same, price becomes a factor, suggesting carrying the less expensive option to mitigate potential loss.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court case Walford v. Lopez, which challenges Hawaii's strict gun carry laws. The speaker argues that Hawaii's law, requiring written permission to carry a firearm on any property not owned by the individual, contradicts the historical context and spirit of the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Bruen decision. The outcome is expected to significantly impact firearm carry rights nationwide.

This video features an expert analysis of recent Supreme Court cases impacting Second Amendment rights, specifically focusing on the Bruen decision and its implications for carrying firearms. The speaker, identified as an expert, discusses a significant case originating in Hawaii that challenges restrictions on carrying guns, predicting the Supreme Court will likely overturn the law based on historical context established by Bruen.

This video discusses the legal implications of carrying larger caliber firearms for self-defense. The speaker emphasizes that the 'largest caliber you can carry safely without risking legal trouble' is highly circumstantial and depends on location, potential threats, and the ability to justify the choice in court. Factors like living in areas with large predators versus urban environments significantly influence this decision, as does the overall context of a self-defense incident.

This video discusses the implications of the Supreme Court's Bruen decision on gun rights, particularly concerning non-violent felons. It highlights how lower courts, like the 11th Circuit, are interpreting the ruling, which mandates a historical analysis of gun laws when restricting rights. The "revolutionary implications" are seen in liberal judges being compelled to rule in favor of gun rights despite personal disagreement.

Colion Noir, an expert in firearms law, discusses the US Supreme Court's decision not to hear a case challenging Hawaii's strict gun licensing requirements. He argues that the state's 'Spirit of Aloha' justification for restricting gun rights is flawed and clashes with Second Amendment protections. The video also touches on the broader strategy of anti-gun groups to enact laws at the state level, knowing they can delay legal challenges for years.

This video discusses the complex issue of gun-free zone signs, emphasizing that while property owners have rights to dictate terms on their private property, the legal ramifications of carrying a firearm in such zones can vary. The speaker, identifying as a gun owner rather than a legal expert, suggests that in private businesses, ignoring a gun-free zone sign might lead to trespassing charges rather than criminal charges for carrying the firearm itself. However, in government buildings, carrying a firearm where prohibited is explicitly against the law. The video highlights the importance of common sense and situational awareness, suggesting concealed carry as a preferred method to avoid unwanted attention and potential conflict.

This YouTube Short, based on its title and description, focuses on the legal ramifications of self-defense, specifically emphasizing the potential for arrest and the need to be prepared for jail time regardless of the perpetrator's actions. It highlights the importance of legal preparedness for individuals who carry firearms for self-defense, suggesting that the burden of proof of innocence may fall on the carrier. The content is framed from a legal perspective concerning firearm ownership and self-defense scenarios.

This YouTube video is a preview for an upcoming podcast episode featuring 2nd Amendment lawyer Jeff Young. The episode will focus on common questions related to firearms and carrying, aiming to inform viewers about their rights and practicalities. The content appears to be legally focused and educational within the firearms community.

This video appears to focus on concealed carry methods, specifically appendix and pocket carry. While the title and description don't mention specific firearm models, calibers, or manufacturers, the content is clearly geared towards individuals interested in carrying a firearm discreetly and comfortably in everyday situations. It likely explores the practicalities, advantages, and potential disadvantages of these carry styles, possibly demonstrating different holster setups and clothing choices to facilitate concealed carry.

This video argues that the debate between open carry and concealed carry is a false dichotomy, as both methods serve different purposes and appeal to different reasoning frameworks. Open carry is often framed as a rights-based argument, emphasizing the constitutional right to bear arms. Concealed carry, conversely, is typically presented as a utility-based argument, focusing on practical advantages like blending in and not telegraphing capabilities. The discussion extends to broader gun control debates, highlighting how differing foundational arguments (rights vs. utility) lead to impasses.

This video announces the passage of a new gun law in Louisiana, designating it as another "Constitutional Carry" state. This implies that residents will likely no longer need a permit to carry firearms concealed. The content will focus on the implications of this legislative change for gun owners in Louisiana.