Videos tagged with Cartel Violence

This video highlights the alarming trend of Mexican drug cartels smuggling specific ammunition calibers into the US, primarily 7.62x39mm (AK ammo) and 5.56x45mm/.223 Remington (AR ammo), along with various handgun rounds. The speaker suggests this is to avoid "red flags" associated with large purchases in the US and indicates preparation for cartel violence within the United States. Authorities like the FBI and Homeland Security are urged to investigate this escalating issue.

The Supreme Court's decision to push back a case brought by Mexico against Smith & Wesson is analyzed. The video argues the court correctly identified straw purchasers and smugglers, not manufacturers, as the source of cartel gun violence. Recent ATF arrests in Texas are cited as evidence supporting the court's reasoning.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos reinforces the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), shielding gun manufacturers from lawsuits unless they are directly aiding and abetting criminal activity. The court indicated that Mexico's case against Smith & Wesson lacked merit, suggesting that the focus should be on 'red flag stores' facilitating straw purchases and Mexico's own border enforcement capabilities. This decision sends a strong message to the White House and the global community regarding accountability for gun violence.

The Supreme Court's decision in Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos sent a powerful message regarding gun industry liability. The court affirmed that gun manufacturers are generally shielded under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), preventing lawsuits unless direct aiding and abetting of criminal acts can be proven. This ruling emphasizes that responsibility for gun violence and smuggling lies with "red flag stores" and governmental border enforcement, not the manufacturers themselves.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson, which involved Mexico suing the firearm manufacturer for its alleged role in cartel gun violence. The court ruled in favor of Smith & Wesson, clarifying that 'aiding and abetting' requires specific wrongful acts and not merely routine business activities that incidentally assist crime. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the details of such rulings for the future of the Second Amendment.

This entry details a tragic event where a TikTok influencer, Valeria, was executed during a livestream. The incident highlights the brutal tactics of Mexican cartels, including the use of symbolic 'gifts' like a pig's head to signify a hit. The narrative emphasizes the dangers faced by public figures and the importance of situational awareness, even in seemingly safe environments.

This video analyzes a unanimous Supreme Court decision dismissing Mexico's lawsuit against the US gun industry, arguing the industry is not responsible for cartel violence. It also discusses Justice Kavanaugh's statement indicating the Court will likely hear an AR-15 ban case, suggesting an internal agreement to strike down such bans. The analysis connects these events to broader Second Amendment jurisprudence, particularly the 'common use' standard established in Heller.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos clarified that gun manufacturers are protected from lawsuits under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) unless they are directly aiding and abetting criminal activity. The court emphasized that responsibility for gun smuggling and cartel violence lies with "red flag stores" and Mexico's own border enforcement, not the manufacturers themselves.

The Supreme Court's decision to push back a case against Smith & Wesson, brought by Mexico, is analyzed. The court's reasoning focused on identifying the true culprits of cartel gun violence: individuals making straw purchases and smuggling guns across the border, often funded by Mexican cartels. Recent ATF arrests in Texas corroborate this assessment, highlighting a pattern of large-scale gun acquisition for illicit export.

The Supreme Court's decision to push back a case against Smith & Wesson, brought by Mexico, is analyzed. The court correctly identified that the fault for cartel gun violence lies not with manufacturers, but with individuals making straw purchases and smuggling guns across the border. Recent ATF arrests in Texas corroborate this finding, highlighting the role of Mexican cartels funding these operations.

Colion Noir, an expert firearms instructor, analyzes Mexico's lawsuit against US gun manufacturers, arguing it's a frivolous attempt to bankrupt the industry, similar to tobacco litigation. He contrasts this with the fentanyl crisis, questioning Mexico's selective accountability. Noir advocates for the Second Amendment and suggests Mexico should empower its citizens with self-defense rights instead of blaming US companies.

This video discusses the significant issue of 200,000 to 500,000 firearms being smuggled from the US into Mexico annually. It highlights that the primary actors involved are Mexican citizens and cartels, not US gun manufacturers. The video criticizes the focus on gun manufacturers and 'red flag stores' for straw purchases, arguing that the core problem lies with the cartels and the individuals facilitating the smuggling.