Videos tagged with Constitutional Amendment

This video discusses the potential for the Second Amendment to be repealed or significantly redefined through a constitutional amendment. The speaker expresses pessimism, suggesting that political shifts and a perceived decline in public support for gun rights could lead to such an amendment within the next 20 years. The discussion touches on the possibility of 'reasonable restrictions' being incorporated into a new amendment, and the challenges of maintaining current gun rights in the face of evolving public opinion and political pressure.

This interview with Senator Mark Baisley discusses the upcoming special legislative session in Colorado, focusing on potential budgetary issues, the controversial SB003, and the implications of AI regulation. Baisley, an aerospace engineer and state senator, expresses concerns about government overspending, the manipulation of fiscal notes, and the potential negative impacts of AI regulation on businesses. He outlines his vision for economic opportunity and fiscal responsibility, emphasizing the importance of citizen involvement in government and the need to protect Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses Senate Joint Resolution 8204, a proposal to amend the Washington State Constitution. The resolution, sponsored by nearly all Democratic Washington State Senators, aims to enshrine rights related to reproductive freedom and gender-affirming care. The speaker explains the legislative process for such a resolution, including the requirement for a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and House before it can be placed on the ballot for voter approval. The video highlights the potential lack of limitations within the proposed amendment regarding age or specific procedures.

This video discusses Tennessee's House Joint Resolution 53, a proposed amendment to the state constitution. The amendment aims to remove the clause allowing the legislature to regulate the wearing of arms to prevent crime, thereby strengthening the right to keep and bear arms for citizens. The speaker highlights this as a significant move to permanently secure gun rights by limiting future legislative power.

This video discusses a proposed constitutional amendment filed by Congressman Andy Ogles to allow Donald Trump to seek a third term. The speaker expresses concern that such a move, driven by current political power, could backfire if power shifts, citing historical examples like Harry Reid's filibuster changes and the ATF's pistol brace regulation. The core argument is that expanding presidential term limits or altering constitutional rules based on immediate political advantage creates a dangerous precedent that can be exploited by opposing parties.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses California Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed constitutional amendment for gun control. It highlights the potential dangers of a constitutional convention, as voiced by State Senator Scott Wiener, and explores the political implications and differing viewpoints on gun safety legislation in the United States. The discussion emphasizes the risks associated with amending the U.S. Constitution.

This video discusses the proposed 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, championed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, which aims to codify gun safety measures. The proposal involves a complex Article 5 convention process and faces significant political and legal hurdles. While proponents argue it will reduce gun violence and enhance safety, critics contend it infringes on Second Amendment rights and may open the door to unintended constitutional changes. The video highlights the differing perspectives on gun control and the challenges of amending the Constitution.

This video discusses President Biden's proposed reforms to the Supreme Court, including eliminating presidential immunity for crimes committed in office, implementing term limits for justices, and establishing a binding code of conduct. The speaker expresses skepticism, framing these proposals as politically motivated attacks on Donald Trump and an attempt to dismantle checks and balances. The video also promotes the GOA National Convention.

This video discusses the potential for Governor Gavin Newsom's gun control initiatives to inadvertently strengthen Second Amendment rights by highlighting perceived overreach and discriminatory practices. It details how New Jersey's slow walking of carry permits and alleged racial discrimination in denials, as reported by Bearing Arms, directly contradict the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. The inaction of New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin is presented as evidence of intentional denial of rights.

This video discusses Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed constitutional amendment to enact stricter gun control measures, including universal background checks, raising the minimum age to 21, implementing waiting periods, and banning assault weapons. The initiative faces significant hurdles due to the difficulty of amending the US Constitution and a lack of widespread support from other states. Critics suggest the proposal is more about political positioning than genuine legislative change, while proponents aim to mobilize public support.

This video discusses House Joint Resolution 37, a proposed constitutional amendment by Representative Thomas Massie. The amendment aims to alter the basis for congressional apportionment by requiring the US Census to count only verified US citizens, rather than the total number of persons in each state. The speaker argues this would more accurately reflect representation based on the citizenry.

This video analyzes California's Senate Joint Resolution 7 (SJR7), an attempt to propose a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. CRPA Legislative Director Rick Travis and the host dissect the resolution's 'whereas' clauses, arguing they are based on flawed data and misinterpretations of historical context and Supreme Court rulings like Bruin. The discussion highlights how SJR7 aims to export California's strict gun control measures nationwide, serving as a political statement rather than a viable legislative path.