Videos tagged with Everytown for Gun Safety

This video discusses California Assembly Bill 2047, a proposed law that would ban 3D printers lacking government-mandated software designed to identify and block firearm parts. Speakers from the ACLU, NRA, and Gun Owners of America express opposition, citing concerns about redundant criminal penalties, privacy invasions due to scanning software, and restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms. The bill's author, Rebecca Bauer-Kahn, and her sponsor, Everytown for Gun Safety, argue it's necessary to regulate 3D printing of firearms. The bill has passed its first committee hurdle and is moving forward.

This video discusses a significant policy shift by Everytown for Gun Safety, moving from advocating for bans to offering firearm training and storage advice. While the speaker is critical of the curriculum's potential biases, they acknowledge that increased training could lead to more informed gun owners. The content touches on safe handling, storage, and the political implications of such programs.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) critically examines Everytown for Gun Safety's new 'Train Smart' firearms training program. The speaker, representing GOA, highlights a perceived hypocrisy in Everytown's actions, noting that while Everytown hires veterans as instructors, they have also lobbied Congress to restrict firearm ownership for veterans facing financial management issues. The video suggests this training program is a 'psyop' to influence public opinion amidst a perceived 'culture war' loss for gun control advocates.

This video discusses the legal arguments presented in an amicus brief filed by the Brady Center, Giffords Law Center, and Everytown for Gun Safety in the Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF case. The brief supports the Department of Justice's defense of the National Firearms Act (NFA), arguing that registration requirements are constitutional under Congress's commerce and taxing powers. The speaker critiques the brief's claims, particularly regarding the intent behind the NFA's tax provisions and the assertion that registration is solely for traceability and deterrence.

This video critically analyzes the amicus brief filed by Brady, Everytown, and Giffords in support of the National Firearms Act (NFA) in the Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF case. The speaker, demonstrating high authority in Second Amendment law, argues that these gun control groups are misrepresenting the purpose of suppressors and NFA-regulated items, using fear-based tactics, and advocating for federal registration lists that could lead to confiscation. The legal strategy of defending the NFA as a tax law is also examined, with a focus on the potential vulnerability if the tax were reduced to zero.

This video critically analyzes a report from Everytown for Gun Safety, funded by Michael Bloomberg, which targets gun dealers. The host, with high authority in Second Amendment news, argues the report misinterprets data like 'Time to Crime' statistics and unfairly blames FFLs for criminal actions such as theft or illegal resale. The report's financial allegations are dismissed as 'fantasy math' to justify regulatory crackdowns aimed at reducing the number of gun dealers. The video also includes a sponsor segment for CMMG firearms and Tri-Star Trading Co. apparel.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) details the legislative battle surrounding H.R. 38, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act. It highlights opposition from groups like the National Fraternal Order of Police and Everytown for Gun Safety, who claim the bill undermines officer safety. GOA counters by citing constitutional rights, the success of constitutional carry in numerous states, and instances where armed citizens have aided law enforcement, arguing that reciprocity enhances public safety and officer protection. The video also touches on the implications of the NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court decision and the role of qualified immunity in the debate.

This video details a new legal strategy targeting firearms manufacturers, exemplified by Everytown for Gun Safety's pressure on Ruger regarding the RXM pistol. The strategy leverages state liability laws and focuses on modular designs and aftermarket compatibility, particularly with Glock parts, to argue that certain firearms are inherently risky due to their potential for easy conversion into machine guns using illegal devices. The outcome for Ruger could set a precedent for how manufacturers approach product design and face legal challenges.

Brandon Herrera, a prominent industry figure, details how the Glock V Model, marketed as unconvertible to full-auto, has already been bypassed by aftermarket modifications. The video critically examines the design changes intended to appease anti-gun groups and discusses the legal implications of auto sears and 'switches' as regulated by the ATF. Herrera also touches on the targeting of other firearms like the Ruger RXM and contrasts different manufacturer strategies.

This video discusses the pressure from Everytown for Gun Safety on firearms manufacturers like Ruger and Glock to redesign firearms perceived as easily convertible into automatic weapons. It highlights the legal and financial implications for companies facing such demands, particularly when the alleged issue stems from third-party illegal modifications rather than inherent design flaws. The discussion emphasizes the potential precedent set by manufacturers yielding to these demands and its impact on the future of the firearms industry.

The video argues that Glock's V-Series is a 'massive scam' designed to take advantage of American consumers. The speaker claims Glock is discontinuing commercial sales of Gen 3, 4, and 5 models while continuing law enforcement sales, and simultaneously promoting the V-Series as an 'improved' Gen 5 with a better trigger. This is framed as Glock siding with anti-Second Amendment legislation and setting a precedent that could undermine other manufacturers and consumer rights.

This video discusses the lawsuit filed by Everytown for Gun Safety against Ruger concerning their RXM pistol, a Glock clone. The lawsuit alleges the firearm is too dangerous due to its ease of modification to full-auto. The speaker and viewers weigh in on whether Ruger should discontinue, modify, or fight the lawsuit, with a strong consensus that the lawsuit lacks merit and Ruger has little to lose by defending it. The discussion also touches on the legal precedent set by Glock's modifications and the broader implications for firearm manufacturers.