Videos tagged with Federal Gun Law

This video, presented by an experienced firearms instructor, delves into the complexities of Florida's gun laws, specifically focusing on the arrest of a gun dealer for selling bump stocks. It highlights the critical distinction between bump stocks and forced reset triggers (FRTs), and the legal confusion arising from conflicting federal and state regulations. The instructor emphasizes how vague legislative language can inadvertently ban a wide range of firearm accessories and stresses the importance of understanding these nuances to avoid legal repercussions.

This video details a significant legal development where the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel has declared federal law 18 U.S.C. 1715 unconstitutional. This law prohibited mailing concealable handguns via USPS. The analysis, presented by Mark W. Smith, emphasizes that this ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights, particularly the ability to transport and receive firearms, as it lacks historical precedent and burdens lawful gun ownership.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering the constitutionality of federal law 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits individuals convicted of crimes punishable by over a year in jail from possessing firearms. The case, Williams v. Attorney General, involves an individual convicted of multiple DUIs, none of which were violent. The court has ordered an en banc review to determine if evidence beyond predicate convictions can be considered when evaluating the law's constitutionality as applied.

This video features Mark Smith, a Constitutional attorney and 'Top Voice of 2A', discussing President Trump's strong support for the Second Amendment and nationwide concealed carry. It clarifies the term 'illegal guns' in law enforcement statistics and highlights Trump's administration's stance on protected firearms like AR-15s, suppressors, and high-capacity magazines, referencing key court cases.

The FIRE Act (Freedom from Improper Regulation and Enforcement Act) aims to federally prohibit state and local governments from enforcing magazine capacity limits. This legislation seeks to establish uniform protection for lawful gun owners across the country, ensuring that magazines legal under federal law are not subject to state-level bans. The bill leverages recent Supreme Court rulings like NYSRPA v. Bruen, arguing that magazine bans lack historical precedent required for constitutional restriction.

This video discusses the proposed ban on Glocks in California, extending to police departments, due to the illegal modification of these firearms into machine guns using 'Glock switches.' The speaker argues this is a misguided approach, likening it to banning all cars because some are illegally modified for speed. The content highlights the ongoing debate and legal challenges surrounding firearm regulations.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering whether to appeal a ruling that found 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) unconstitutional as applied to cannabis users. The Eighth Circuit's decision in United States v. Baxter suggests that prohibiting cannabis users from possessing firearms lacks historical justification. The DOJ's decision, due May 4th, could impact numerous ongoing legal challenges nationwide.

This video, presented by William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the significant Fifth Circuit ruling in United States v. Paola Connelly. The decision re-examines federal prohibitions on firearm possession for cannabis users, particularly in light of the Bruen decision. The court found the federal ban unconstitutional as applied to Paola Connelly, a sober, occasional cannabis user, rejecting historical analogies used by the government to justify the ban. While the ruling is narrow, it sets a crucial precedent for future challenges to federal gun laws affecting lawful drug users.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal gun law 18 USC 922 G3 is unconstitutional as applied to nonviolent marijuana users. The court found that the government failed to demonstrate a historical tradition of disarming such individuals, distinguishing this case from historical laws concerning the mentally ill, dangerous individuals, or intoxication. This decision specifically addresses the application of the law to individuals like Paulo Connelly, who were indicted for firearm possession while being nonviolent marijuana users.

Hunter Biden's conviction for firearm possession by a drug user is being challenged based on the argument that the law lacks historical tradition, a standard set by the Supreme Court in *Bruen*. Legal experts suggest his appeal may succeed on this specific charge, citing Fifth Circuit precedent in *U.S. v. Daniels*. However, charges related to lying on federal forms may stand. The video also highlights the upcoming Supreme Court decision in *U.S. v. Rahimi* concerning domestic violence restraining orders and firearm possession.

This video discusses the federal law prohibiting firearms in post offices, specifically 18 USC 930(a), and a recent court challenge in United States v. Ayala. The court found the law unconstitutional as applied to the defendant due to a lack of historical analogues supporting such a ban, aligning with the Bruen decision's framework. The government is appealing this ruling.

The Ninth Circuit, in United States v. Duarte, has overturned a federal gun law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits felons from possessing firearms. This decision, influenced by the Bruen opinion, challenges the government's argument that felons are excluded from the Second Amendment's protection. The court applied a text and history framework, finding that Duarte's handgun qualifies as an 'arm' and his conduct falls within the Second Amendment's plain language. The government's assertion that felons are not part of 'the people' was rejected, citing Heller and Bruen.