Is the 3rd Circuit About to Crush Another Federal Gun Law?

This video analyzes the legal response from the State of New Jersey to the US Department of Justice's amicus brief regarding the Cheeseman v. Platkin case. The case challenges New Jersey's assault weapon ban and is now before a full en banc panel of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the details of New Jersey's filing, highlighting their strong reaction to the DOJ's input. The video aims to educate viewers on the legal intricacies of Second Amendment challenges in New Jersey.

This video discusses potential changes to New Jersey's gun laws, focusing on the legal challenges in Koons v. Platkin regarding sensitive places and Cheeseman v. Platkin concerning the state's assault weapon ban. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk analyzes how these cases, now being reviewed by an en banc panel at the 3rd Circuit, combined with political factors, could lead to significant shifts in Second Amendment rights within the state. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these developments.

This video discusses a significant development in gun rights as Judge Jennifer Mascott is appointed to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explains how this appointment, following a Motion to Invoke Cloture in the Senate, could impact New Jersey's Assault Weapon Ban and similar legislation across the country. The appointment is framed as a potential 'first domino' in a series of events that could lead to the permanent resolution of assault weapon bans, emphasizing the importance of education and awareness for gun owners.

This video discusses the legal challenge to New Jersey's assault weapon ban in the case of Cheeseman v. Platkin. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law explains that the case has been ordered for en banc review by the Chief Judge of the 3rd Circuit, meaning all active judges will hear the case. This development presents a significant opportunity to challenge assault weapon bans nationwide, not just within New Jersey. The video aims to educate viewers on the legal implications and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights.

The United States Department of Justice has begun restoring firearm rights to individuals with felony convictions, a process halted for over 30 years. This move, though administratively small, is significant given the legal landscape reshaped by the *NYSRPA v. Bruen* Supreme Court decision. It suggests a potential shift in how lifetime firearm prohibitions are viewed constitutionally, with ongoing legal challenges questioning their validity under the new standard.

This video discusses a significant legal challenge brought forth by FPC (Firearms Policy Coalition) against 18 USC Section 922(b)(3), a federal law that prohibits out-of-state handgun purchases from dealers. The lawsuit, Elite Precision v. ATF, argues that this restriction lacks historical legal precedent. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides an analysis of the case, questioning if FPC has taken on an overly ambitious endeavor. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the matter and highlights resources for supporting the Second Amendment, including FPC, Protect With Bear, and Washington Gun Law's newsletter and contact information.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.