Videos tagged with Force Reset Triggers

This video provides an in-depth analysis of President Trump's executive order aimed at restoring Second Amendment rights. It breaks down the order's directives to the Attorney General, focusing on reviewing past infringements and proposing actions to reverse restrictions. The speaker details specific areas impacted, including ammunition import policies, NFA item processing times, federal firearms license enforcement, and the reclassification of firearm components. The analysis highlights how the order could potentially reverse policies enacted between January 2021 and January 2025, offering a roadmap for restoring gun rights.

This video discusses the appointment of David Warrington, a lawyer who successfully argued against the ATF's ban on force reset triggers in the Fifth Circuit, as the top White House lawyer for President-elect Trump. It highlights this as a significant win for Second Amendment advocacy groups like NAGR, emphasizing the legal strategy and the court's ruling that the ATF overstepped its authority by reclassifying these triggers as machine guns without Congressional action. The content underscores the importance of legal challenges against agency overreach.

This video provides a critical update on the legal challenges surrounding Rare Breed Triggers and their FRT-15 WOT devices. A New York judge issued a preliminary injunction against the government, a contrasting ruling to a previous Texas decision. The speaker highlights the legal arguments concerning whether these triggers constitute machine guns and advises owners on potential government contact and legal recourse.

This video addresses the situation where individuals have destroyed or disposed of potentially regulated firearm triggers (like Rare Breed Force Reset Triggers) but lack proof. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains that the ATF's 'Operation Reticent Recall' involves a silent recall or seizure of these items. If contacted by the ATF and found to be otherwise eligible to possess firearms, individuals will likely be asked to sign a declaration detailing the trigger's disposal. Lying on this declaration constitutes a federal offense under 18 U.S. Code § 1001, punishable by up to five years in prison. Kirk advises consulting an attorney to understand the consequences of either signing or refusing to sign the declaration.