BIG LOSS For Rare Breed Triggers!

Published on September 5, 2023
Duration: 4:54

This video provides a critical update on the legal challenges surrounding Rare Breed Triggers and their FRT-15 WOT devices. A New York judge issued a preliminary injunction against the government, a contrasting ruling to a previous Texas decision. The speaker highlights the legal arguments concerning whether these triggers constitute machine guns and advises owners on potential government contact and legal recourse.

Quick Summary

A New York judge issued a preliminary injunction against the government in the Rare Breed Triggers case, prohibiting the sale or transfer of FRT-15 WOT and similar force reset triggers. This ruling contrasts with a previous Texas decision. Owners are advised to consult legal counsel if contacted by the ATF.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Update on Rare Breed Triggers Case
  2. 00:53New York Judge's Ruling
  3. 02:26Legal Status of Triggers
  4. 02:52Record Preservation Order
  5. 03:11Advice for Owners
  6. 03:42Future Legal Battles
  7. 04:13Related Video Mention

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the New York ruling on Rare Breed Triggers?

In Brooklyn, NY, a judge issued a preliminary injunction against the government, ruling in their favor. This means Rare Breed Triggers is prohibited from selling or transferring their FRT-15 WOT or similar force reset triggers.

What is the legal argument regarding Rare Breed Triggers and machine guns?

Rare Breed argues their triggers are not machine guns because the ATF has conceded that the trigger must be pulled each time the gun fires, a characteristic that disproves it as a machine gun conversion device.

What should owners of Rare Breed Triggers do if contacted by the ATF?

If you own one of these triggers and are contacted by the ATF, it is advised to consult with an attorney. Do not sign any forms without legal counsel, as the ATF is reportedly pursuing customer lists.

How does the New York ruling contrast with the Texas ruling on Rare Breed Triggers?

The New York ruling granted a preliminary injunction against the government, favoring their position. This is the opposite of a previous ruling in Texas by Judge Reed O'Connor, who had issued a temporary restraining order protecting Rare Breed.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →