Videos tagged with Fourteenth Amendment

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the National Constitutional Carry Act introduced by Senator Mike Lee. The proposed legislation aims to establish constitutional carry nationwide, asserting that lawful citizens should not be penalized by any state for carrying a firearm in public, aligning with Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights as interpreted by Supreme Court rulings like Heller, McDonald, and Bruen. The expert analysis covers the bill's core principles, its potential impact on restrictive states, and the significant political challenges it faces in the current legislative climate.

This video discusses a significant US Supreme Court ruling that vindicated Judge Roger Benitez's injunction against California policies that prevented schools from notifying parents about their children's gender transitioning. The court's decision emphasizes parental rights, particularly concerning religious objections and the right to raise children as parents see fit, citing the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling highlights the importance of parental involvement in a child's life and criticizes policies that exclude parents from critical information.

This video, presented by The VSO Gun Channel, features an expert discussing the legal and historical right to manufacture firearms. The speaker, exhibiting high authority, details how this right is protected under the First, Second, and Fourteenth Amendments, arguing against government overreach in registration and serialization, particularly concerning privately made and 3D-printed firearms.

This video breaks down the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Beard v. Bonta, which overturned California's open carry ban in densely populated counties. Speaker Ted explains how the ruling applies the Bruin framework, emphasizing the 'text, history, and tradition' test, and discusses the implications for gun owners in California and potentially other states. The expert analysis highlights the legal reasoning behind the decision and clarifies what aspects of California's gun laws remain unchanged.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a new law in New York mandating firearm confiscation by police during domestic violence calls. Expertly analyzed by Jared, the law removes officer discretion, requiring seizure if a victim expresses fear or officers believe it prevents harm. The discussion highlights concerns over constitutional rights, extended holding periods, and potential national implications.

This video critically analyzes proposed 'red flag' laws, specifically Maine's Question 2, arguing they are unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The speaker, Jared from Guns & Gadgets, details how these laws allegedly bypass due process, violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure, and erode the presumption of innocence. The Fraternal Order of Police in Maine is also noted as opposing the measure, not for constitutional reasons, but due to increased risks to law enforcement.

This video discusses the lawsuit Harrington v. Crawford, filed by the Second Amendment Foundation, which alleges violations of multiple constitutional amendments by school officials against an 18-year-old student. The case highlights concerns about government overreach and the potential for individuals to be targeted for legally owning firearms, particularly in constitutional carry states. The speaker urges viewers to contact the Department of Justice to demand a criminal investigation into the officials involved.

Colion Noir, an attorney and expert on Second Amendment litigation, analyzes the DOJ's lawsuit against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. The suit alleges unconstitutional delays in concealed carry permitting, violating residents' rights. Noir critiques 'common sense' gun laws and emphasizes the fundamental right to self-defense, regardless of the firearm type.

This video discusses the lawsuit filed by the Trump administration's Department of Justice against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department for unconstitutional delays in processing concealed-carry permit applications. The speaker argues that such delays exemplify why 'common sense' gun laws are often a pretext for control and why constitutional carry is a necessary pursuit to protect fundamental rights.

This video provides an expert-level legal analysis of how recent Supreme Court decisions, particularly *Ramos v. Louisiana* and its reaffirmation in *Edwards v. Vannoy*, could impact firearm permitting laws nationwide. The speaker, demonstrating deep legal expertise, explains the incorporation of the Sixth Amendment's unanimous jury requirement to states via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This precedent is then directly linked to the *Bruen* decision's incorporation of the Second Amendment through the same mechanism. The core argument posits that 'may issue' or 'good cause' permitting schemes, which rely on subjective government discretion, are now vulnerable to legal challenges. Such schemes are argued to violate the Due Process Clause by denying a fundamental right without objective criteria, potentially leading to the dismantling of these discretionary systems in states like California, New York, and New Jersey.

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by Gun Owners of America (GOA) against Florida's ban on open carry. GOA is seeking a summary judgment to declare the ban unconstitutional, arguing it violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. If successful, this would restore open carry rights to millions of Floridians.