Videos tagged with FPC Action Foundation

This episode of Freedom Under Fire features Cody from the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) discussing ongoing legal battles for Second Amendment rights. Key topics include the fight for 18-20 year olds' right to bear arms, challenges to magazine restrictions in DC, the Massachusetts handgun roster ban, and the broader issue of legal standing and delays in firearms litigation. FPC is actively pursuing numerous cases nationwide to protect constitutional rights.

This video features Cody Wisnoski of the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) Action Foundation discussing several key legal challenges and updates impacting Second Amendment rights. Topics include a new lawsuit challenging the federal ban on interstate handgun transfers, significant wins for 18-20 year olds' rights to purchase and carry firearms, the ongoing legal battle against the ATF's pistol brace rule, and a recent ruling finding the federal machine gun ban unconstitutional as applied. The discussion also touches on First Amendment rights related to firearms expression and the complexities of state-level firearm restrictions like Massachusetts' handgun roster.

This video provides an expert analysis of the legal challenge to New York's 'assault weapon' ban, specifically the *Lane v. Racca* case. Host Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, details how the court denied the state's motion to dismiss, affirming plaintiffs' standing. The discussion highlights the significance of AR-15 style firearms being deemed 'in common use' and the accelerated timeline for the case's progression towards a summary judgment.

This segment from Gun Talk Radio features Cody Wisnoski, General Counsel and VP of Legal at FPC Action Foundation, discussing the current landscape of Second Amendment litigation. He highlights the shift from legislative action to courtrooms, the collaborative efforts of gun rights organizations, and the strategic importance of incremental legal victories. Wisnoski explains how concepts like the Overton Window influence public perception and judicial decisions, emphasizing that legal progress is built brick by brick.