Videos tagged with Gun Policy

This video discusses the widespread non-compliance of Canadian gun owners with government confiscation orders following a 2020 firearm ban. It highlights that despite lacking constitutional protections like the US Second Amendment, approximately 90% of gun owners refused to participate in the buyback program. The speaker argues that policy decisions should not be solely driven by the emotional responses of individuals who have experienced tragedy, emphasizing that different people react to trauma with different desires for safety, including the acquisition of firearms.

This video analyzes Kamala Harris's past statements and actions regarding Second Amendment rights, particularly in the context of a potential 2028 presidential run. It highlights her support for bans on 'assault weapons,' mandatory buybacks, and executive actions to circumvent Congress. The analysis also touches on her past role in drafting legislation allowing home inspections of firearm storage and her virtual banning of guns in a video game map. The speaker argues that Harris's record indicates a consistent pattern of seeking to disarm law-abiding citizens while empowering the government.

This video critically analyzes Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's executive orders aimed at gun control. The speaker, identified as a high-authority independent news commentator for the 2A community, details how these orders bypass legislative processes to implement bans on 'assault weapons' and high-capacity magazines, expand Red Flag Laws (ERPOs), and mandate safe storage initiatives. The analysis suggests these actions are a strategic move to build a data-driven case for future restrictive legislation.

This video from the NRA discusses Nancy Pelosi's retirement from Congress, framing it as a victory for gun rights advocates. It highlights her past efforts to ban certain firearms, contrasting them with Donald Trump's campaign promises. The JR15 rifle, marketed towards families, is also featured, symbolizing a different approach to firearm ownership. The content is critical of Pelosi's stance on gun control and celebratory of her departure from political leadership.

This interview with Michael McCoy from Mountain States Legal Foundation and Taylor Rhodes from RMGO discusses Colorado's three-day waiting period for firearm purchases. The conversation is framed within the broader context of defending the Second Amendment and supporting the 2A movement. The episode also features co-host Big Timber Lodge and promotes various social media channels and support avenues for the organization.

This video from Gun Owners of America argues that supporting the Second Amendment is politically advantageous for politicians. It highlights polling data showing Republicans leading on gun policy and crime, and cites the electoral consequences for Republicans who voted for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The video also points to actions taken during the Trump administration, such as the rollback of NFA taxes and changes in Washington D.C. prosecution, as examples of successful pro-gun policies.

This video analyzes White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's response to questions regarding Second Amendment policies and red flag laws. The host argues that modern red flag laws are unnecessary and a political ploy, as existing civil commitment laws already provide robust due process protections for individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others. The analysis emphasizes that the Trump administration, through its actions and statements, supports Second Amendment rights and prefers addressing mental health issues through established legal frameworks rather than new gun control measures.

This ARFCOM News episode, delivered with an authoritative tone, delves into complex gun policy debates. It critically examines Trump's actions regarding firearm exports and the lingering 'sporting purposes' ban, while also highlighting concerns over the ATF's 'engaged in the business' rule and new state-level gun bans. The content emphasizes the importance of political engagement for gun owners.

This video discusses California's AB1127 bill, colloquially known as the 'Glock ban.' The bill aims to remove Glocks from the state's roster of approved firearms, making them unavailable for future purchase by the general public, though law enforcement and government officials would be exempt. The presenter notes the bill's rapid progression through the California Assembly and Senate committees, highlighting the political landscape that favors its passage due to the supermajority held by the left in the state legislature. The primary hope for preventing its enactment lies in potential legal challenges and injunctions, though the speaker expresses skepticism about the California court system's efficiency in this regard.

The Trump administration's DOJ, through the US Attorney for D.C., Janine Piro, has announced a policy shift refusing to prosecute mere carrying of rifles and shotguns in D.C. This decision is based on the understanding that such blanket prohibitions violate Second Amendment rights, as established in Heller and Bruen. The policy still allows prosecution of prohibited persons, such as convicted felons, for firearm possession.

This video discusses insights from ATF and FBI liaisons at industry conferences regarding new White House gun policies. The ATF agents expressed satisfaction with the current direction, indicating a shift towards focusing on serious criminals rather than everyday gun owners. They also noted that policy changes and shifting definitions make their jobs difficult, but recent policy shifts allow for more discretion, which they appreciate.

This video appears to be a passionate and likely confrontational response to an argument advocating for fewer firearms. The title "You Need Less Guns" Shut Your Mouth! strongly suggests a pro-gun rights stance, with the creator aiming to defend gun ownership and likely counter the opposing viewpoint. Without a transcript, the specific firearms, calibers, or arguments discussed are unknown, but the tone indicates a spirited debate or rebuttal within the Second Amendment discourse.