Videos tagged with Hawaii Gun Law

This video features an expert analysis of the 'Vampire Rule' in various states, focusing on its application to concealed carry permit holders. The speaker, demonstrating deep legal knowledge, contrasts the requirements in states like Hawaii, New York, New Jersey, and Maryland with California's unique approach, highlighting how the Ninth Circuit's ruling differentiated between them. The discussion emphasizes the nuances of requiring affirmative permission versus specific signage for firearm carry in businesses.

This video features an expert analysis from CRPA TV discussing Hawaii's attempt to reframe gun laws as a property rights issue rather than a Second Amendment issue before the Supreme Court. The speaker highlights the legal challenges Hawaii faces, particularly with Justice Roberts questioning the differential treatment of Second Amendment rights compared to other constitutional freedoms. The discussion uses analogies to illustrate the potential constitutional overreach.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court case Walford v. Lopez, which challenges Hawaii's strict gun carry laws. The speaker argues that Hawaii's law, requiring written permission to carry a firearm on any property not owned by the individual, contradicts the historical context and spirit of the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Bruen decision. The outcome is expected to significantly impact firearm carry rights nationwide.

This video discusses the oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez before the Supreme Court, focusing on Hawaii's 'vampire rule' which requires businesses to post signs allowing firearms for concealed carry permits to be valid. Experts analyze the justices' questions, the arguments presented regarding private property rights versus Second Amendment rights, and the controversial use of historical Black Codes as an analog. The discussion highlights concerns about states circumventing the Bruin decision and the potential for a broad ruling that clarifies Second Amendment methodology.

The Supreme Court has granted emergency review in Wolford v. Lopez, a case challenging Hawaii's law that presumptively prohibits concealed carry on private property open to the public unless explicitly permitted. This case directly addresses state defiance of the Bruin ruling and could determine the future of gun carry rights nationwide, potentially impacting laws in New York, California, and New Jersey.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case Walford v. Lopez, which addresses the legality of carrying firearms on private property open to the public. Gun Owners of America (GOA) played a role in creating the circuit split that led to this case, stemming from their Antonyuk v. James case in New York. The core issue is whether states can implement 'vampire clauses' that require explicit permission from private property owners for concealed carry, effectively banning it by default in many locations.

This video discusses legal challenges to gun control measures, including the Washington Attorney General's investigation into the Second Amendment Foundation and the Supreme Court case Wolford v. Lopez concerning Hawaii's 'sensitive places' law. It also touches on allegations that Colt Canada, owned by CZ, is involved in destroying firearms confiscated under Canada's buyback program, though CZ denies direct involvement in the buyback itself.

Joel Persinger of GunGuyTV provides a concise update on the Second Amendment landscape, focusing on the Wolford v. Lopez case. This case challenges Hawaii's law, which bans firearm carry on private property open to the public unless express permission is granted, a rule often termed the 'vampire rule.' The video explains how this law inverts historical carry norms and its potential impact on similar laws in states like California.

The Supreme Court has accepted the case Wolford v. Lopez, challenging Hawaii's "sensitive places" law that presumes private property open to the public is a gun-free zone unless the owner explicitly permits carry. This decision marks a significant development in Second Amendment litigation, potentially impacting how "sensitive places" are defined and regulated nationwide. The Ninth Circuit's prior ruling upholding Hawaii's law, based on historical analogies, is now under Supreme Court review.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant Second Amendment case challenging Hawaii's law restricting concealed carry on private property without owner consent. This case, stemming from 'Bruen' response laws enacted by several states, could expand or clarify carry rights in public spaces like malls and restaurants. The decision is expected by next summer and will apply the 'Bruen' test, requiring gun control measures to align with historical tradition.

This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision to review Yukataki v. Lopez, a case challenging Hawaii's restrictive firearm purchase and registration laws. It highlights the rarity of en banc reviews in the Ninth Circuit, suggesting a potential bias against Second Amendment rights when such reviews occur, especially when prior three-judge panels have ruled in favor of gun owners.

This video from Washington Gun Law TV features legal expert William Kirk analyzing a significant Supreme Court case challenging Hawaii's firearm possession laws. The discussion centers on an amicus brief filed by Barry Arrington of the National Association for Gun Rights, which critiques how courts, particularly the Ninth Circuit, interpret historical precedent for gun regulation. Kirk highlights the ongoing debate over relying on founding-era versus Reconstruction-era law and the potential for inconsistent application of Second Amendment rights.