Videos tagged with Lawful Gun Ownership

This video discusses the aftermath of the Bondi terror attack, focusing on the response of anti-gun groups and the political implications for licensed firearm owners in Australia. The speaker argues that the focus should be on addressing terrorism and hate, not on restricting law-abiding citizens. He emphasizes the importance of political engagement for firearm owners and highlights the efforts of organizations like the Shooters Union in advocating for their rights.

This video discusses the arrest and prolonged legal ordeal of John Rishloo Booth, a British IT consultant, who was detained and charged in the UK after posting a photo of himself legally handling a firearm during a vacation in Florida. The presenter argues this incident highlights the fragility of gun rights and freedom of speech, drawing parallels to potential anti-gun sentiments in the US. The narrative emphasizes the importance of vigilance in defending constitutional rights against perceived government overreach and the erosion of freedoms.

This video from Washington Gun Law TV, hosted by William Kirk, discusses the legal ramifications of making threats against public officials, specifically Governor Bob Ferguson. It analyzes two Washington state statutes, RCW 9A.36.090 (Threats Against Governor or Family) and RCW 9A.76.180 (Intimidating a Public Servant), highlighting potential defenses and the broader implications of such actions. The video emphasizes the importance of lawful and responsible gun ownership while criticizing the use of threats and intimidation in political discourse, advocating for constructive criticism instead.

This video discusses the ATF's removal of a gun violence memorial display from its lobby. The speaker argues this display was a form of political propaganda intended to link lawful gun ownership with criminal acts. The removal is framed as a positive step towards depoliticizing the agency's messaging and a course correction under new leadership.

This video analyzes the US v. Harrison federal court case, which challenged the constitutionality of 18 USC 922(g)(3), prohibiting unlawful marijuana users from possessing firearms. The court applied the Bruen test, determining that the government failed to demonstrate historical tradition supporting such a broad prohibition. The analysis highlights the distinction between historical restrictions on dangerous individuals and the current ban on marijuana users, emphasizing that the government bears the burden of proof in justifying firearm regulations.

This video asserts that the Second Amendment is a fundamental right protecting the ownership of firearms. It argues that any laws infringing upon this right are unconstitutional and represent government overreach. The core message emphasizes the unalienable nature of the right to bear arms, protected by the Constitution.

This video debunks the New York Times' claim that legal gun sales contribute to violent crime. Experts from the Heritage Foundation argue that crime has decreased over 30 years despite increased gun ownership, and that criminals, not lawful owners, are responsible for the vast majority of violent crimes. They emphasize that correlation does not equal causation, and that increased gun purchases during the pandemic were a response to perceived threats and a decline in police response times, not a cause of crime.

This video explains Washington State's Concealed Pistol License (CPL) requirements. It details when a CPL is necessary for concealed carry or loaded firearm transport in vehicles. The video clarifies Washington as a 'shall issue' state, outlines application procedures at local police or sheriff's departments, and lists specific prohibited locations for carrying firearms, even with a CPL.

This video tackles the controversial topic of open-carrying firearms specifically for the purpose of drawing attention. The creator questions the ethics and motivations behind such actions, posing the question of whether it's shameful. The description emphasizes viewer support and the absence of sponsorships, with links provided for Patreon, merchandise, and social media channels. It aims to be a platform for discussing common interests related to hobbies, tactics, and opinions within the firearm community.

This video discusses the erosion of due process rights concerning firearm ownership, particularly in the context of restraining orders and "red flag" laws. Chuck Michel highlights how these measures can lead to the confiscation of firearms without adequate legal protections, potentially impacting law-abiding citizens based on unsubstantiated complaints. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the presumption of innocence and the right to be heard before losing constitutional rights.

This video from Guns & Gadgets Media discusses what the creator terms "backdoor gun control" legislation, suggesting it is pending in various states. The description emphasizes that the content is for informational and entertainment purposes only, produced in a safe environment by trained professionals. The disclaimer clarifies that opinions expressed are those of the author and that all actions are performed on state-approved ranges. The video aims to inform viewers about legislative changes impacting firearm ownership.

This video, titled "Freedom’s Safest Place | San Bernardino," argues against restrictive gun control measures in California. The description highlights concerns that these regulations disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens, making it harder for them to defend themselves from criminals. The NRA is presented as a protector of the right to bear arms and, by extension, a "safest place" for freedom. The content focuses on the political and social implications of gun ownership rights.