Videos tagged with Minnesota Law

Instructor Mike, an experienced voice in the 2A and tactical community, critically examines the Alex Preddy case in Minnesota. He advises against encouraging others to confront authorities like ICE without understanding the severe personal consequences, emphasizing a pragmatic approach to self-defense and legal risks over ideological confrontation.

This video features Johnny B and Paul Harrell discussing a variety of political memes and commentary, touching on topics from immigration and gun rights to specific state laws and political figures. The content is presented with a humorous and satirical tone, interspersed with a sponsorship segment for Patriot Mobile.

This video details the legal battle of Matthew Anderson, who faced felony charges for possessing unserialized, privately made firearms (PMFs) in Minnesota. The charges were ultimately dropped following the Minnesota Supreme Court's ruling in State v. Vagel, which clarified that state law regarding unserialized firearms does not apply to PMFs not required to be serialized under federal law.

The Supreme Court has affirmed that restricting adults aged 18-20 from carrying firearms violates their Second Amendment rights. This ruling, stemming from a Minnesota law challenged in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, has significant implications for similar laws across the country, particularly within the 8th Circuit. While immediate changes are expected in the 8th Circuit, other jurisdictions may see a slower impact as these legal battles unfold.

The Supreme Court has affirmed that prohibiting adults aged 18-20 from carrying firearms violates their Second Amendment rights, building upon the precedent set in the Brewan v. New York case. This ruling, initially applied to a Minnesota law and upheld by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, is expected to influence similar cases across other circuits, potentially leading to the dismantling of age-based carry restrictions nationwide. While immediate relief is expected in the 8th Circuit, other regions may see a slower impact as lower courts interpret and apply this decision.

This video highlights how Google's AI search results can provide inaccurate information regarding firearm restrictions, specifically citing an example from Minnesota concerning magazine capacity and microstamping laws. The presenter argues that this misinformation can lead to confusion and potentially deter individuals from exercising their Second Amendment rights. The video emphasizes the need for users to verify information from multiple sources, especially when dealing with legal matters concerning firearms.

This video from Washington Gun Law, presented by William Kirk, analyzes a recent Minnesota Supreme Court ruling that extends the judicially created duty to retreat in self-defense cases. Kirk explains that this duty is not codified in Minnesota statute but is judge-made law, and the court has narrowly applied it to felony second-degree assault-fear involving a dangerous weapon, like a machete. He contrasts this with Washington state law, which does not impose a duty to retreat.

A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that a vehicle can be considered a public place when on a public highway, potentially impacting laws regarding carrying firearms in cars. This decision reverses a lower court's dismissal of a case involving a BB gun found in a vehicle, which was initially considered not a public place. The ruling raises questions about how state laws interact with Second Amendment rights and existing legal traditions.

This video discusses a significant legal challenge to Minnesota's law prohibiting 18-20 year olds from obtaining concealed carry permits. The oral arguments in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals suggest a favorable outcome for Second Amendment plaintiffs, focusing on the interpretation of 'the people' in the Second Amendment and the lack of historical tradition for such age-based restrictions. The discussion also touches upon the implications of the 26th Amendment and potential procedural hurdles like mootness.

This video discusses a federal lawsuit challenging Minnesota's age limit for handgun carry permits, arguing it unconstitutionally bars 18-20 year olds from exercising their Second Amendment rights. The case highlights arguments that individuals old enough to vote, marry, and serve in the military should also be able to carry handguns for self-defense. National gun rights groups, including the Firearms Policy Coalition, are intervening in support of the plaintiffs.