Videos tagged with Non-Resident Carry

This video details a significant federal lawsuit challenging Hawaii's ban on non-residents carrying firearms. The lawsuit, filed by Jonathan Solinsky and the Hawaii Rifle Association, argues that Hawaii Revised Statute 134-9, subsection Alpha 5, violates the Second Amendment by requiring residency for concealed carry permits. The case hinges on the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, asserting that historical evidence supports the right of travelers to carry arms for self-defense, making Hawaii's strict residency requirement an unconstitutional outlier.

This episode of Gun For Hire Radio, hosted by Anthony Colandro, addresses the post-election landscape for gun owners in New Jersey and New York. Featuring attorney Peter Tillim of NY TAC Defense, the discussion focuses on New York's carry laws and strategies for non-residents. The conversation also highlights the benefits of NY TAC Defense insurance, offering significant coverage for gun owners at an affordable daily rate, and emphasizes the importance of continued advocacy for Second Amendment rights.

This video details a significant legal victory for gun owners, with a federal court ruling California's ban on non-resident carry applications unconstitutional in Hoffman v. Bonta. The decision aligns with the Bruen ruling's 'history and tradition' standard, moving away from subjective safety justifications. While not establishing national reciprocity, it opens permit application processes to qualified out-of-state applicants who must still meet objective criteria.

This video from Copper Jacket TV breaks down a significant Second Amendment victory concerning firearm carry laws. A federal district court judge ruled New York's ban on non-resident carry permits unconstitutional, directly influenced by the Bruen decision. This ruling challenges similar laws in states like California and implies a broader shift in how courts interpret public safety versus constitutional rights.

This video discusses a significant legal development allowing non-residents to carry firearms in California for the first time in nearly 60 years. The change follows a lawsuit by the CRPA, with the application process opening on April 22nd after a 90-day waiting period. The video also includes promotional segments for "Attorneys on Retainer" and American Hartford Gold, along with disclaimers about not being a lawyer and the content being for educational and entertainment purposes only.

This video explains how non-residents can legally carry firearms in California, highlighting the new reciprocity laws. It details the current process, potential delays, and provides context on the legal landscape. The video encourages viewers to support the CRPA in their ongoing fight for Second Amendment rights and mentions sponsors CCW Safe and Police Credit Union.

A recent court order in California, CRPA v. LASC, mandates the creation of a non-resident concealed carry permit. While this offers an option for frequent visitors to California, the application process is described as difficult and lengthy, mirroring requirements for California residents. Applicants must be members of specific plaintiff organizations and undergo evaluations, with the permit itself carrying significant restrictions.

This video announces a significant development for non-residents carrying firearms in California, thanks to legal actions by CRPA, GOA, GOC, and 2AF. The lawsuit CRPA v. LASD has led to a proposed order outlining new rules and regulations for non-resident carry. The creator also promotes Attorneys on Retainer with a discount code and links to their constitution book and social media.

This video discusses the lawsuit Hoffman v. Bonta, filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), challenging California's ban on non-residents carrying operable firearms in public. The lawsuit argues this ban violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, especially post-Bruen. A victory is anticipated, potentially forcing California to recognize permits from other states and constitutional carry states.

This video discusses the significant legal case Higbie v. James, filed by GOA and others in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. The case challenges New York's laws that prevent non-residents from obtaining carry permits and do not recognize out-of-state permits. This effectively means only New York residents can legally carry firearms. The video argues this situation is unconstitutional, as citizens shouldn't lose a fundamental right simply by crossing a state line. It highlights this case, along with another in California, as potential avenues for expanding gun rights as intended by the Founders. Viewers are encouraged to educate themselves and support GOA's efforts.

A Massachusetts state court judge has established a significant legal precedent supporting nationwide carry rights, ruling it unconstitutional to charge a New Hampshire resident for carrying a firearm without a state permit. This decision, grounded in the Second Amendment and the 'text and history' test from NYSRPA v. Bruen, asserts that constitutional rights do not cease at state borders. Expert analysis from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith highlights the ruling's challenge to outdated state precedents that treated firearm carry as a privilege.