Videos tagged with Non-Resident Carry

This video from Guns & Gadgets details a significant federal lawsuit challenging Hawaii's strict residency requirement for concealed carry permits. The lawsuit argues that this ban on non-residents carrying firearms violates the Second Amendment, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. Expert analysis highlights historical precedents and the broader implications for firearm reciprocity across state lines.

This video discusses the lawsuit Sinsky v. Lopez filed by attorney Alan Beck against the state of Hawaii. The case challenges Hawaii's law prohibiting non-residents from obtaining concealed carry permits, arguing it violates the Second Amendment. The plaintiff, Jonathan Sinsky, a former Marine and firearms instructor, is presented as a sympathetic figure whose background supports the claim for a nationwide right to carry.

This video provides an expert analysis of the legal landscape surrounding Second Amendment rights in California, specifically focusing on the dissolution of the injunction in Hoffman v. Bonta. The discussion highlights how legislative action, such as AB 1078, can render court-ordered injunctions moot by creating new legal frameworks, even if those frameworks are restrictive. The analysis is presented from a high-level legal commentator's perspective.

This guide outlines the process and considerations for obtaining non-resident firearm carry permits, particularly following the ruling in Hoffman v. Bonta that struck down California's ban. It emphasizes that while residency barriers are falling, applicants must still meet objective criteria like background checks and training. The guide, drawing on expert analysis of the Bruen decision and legal precedents, advises travelers to be aware of diverse state jurisdictions and ongoing legal developments.

This video from Copper Jacket TV, featuring expert analysis, breaks down a significant Second Amendment victory where a federal judge ruled New York's ban on non-resident carry permits unconstitutional. The ruling, influenced by the Bruen decision, mandates that New York must accept carry permit applications from residents of other states, challenging similar laws in states like California.

This video details the process for non-residents to legally obtain a Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) permit in California, stemming from the CRPA v. LASD lawsuit. It outlines the steps involved, including selecting a jurisdiction, completing applications and training remotely, and navigating specific California firearm regulations. The process aims to allow out-of-state residents to obtain a California CCW without needing to travel extensively within the state for interviews or training.

A recent court order in California, CRPA v. LASC, mandates the creation of a non-resident concealed carry permit. While this offers an option for frequent visitors to California, the application process is described as difficult and lengthy, mirroring requirements for California residents. Applicants must be members of specific plaintiff organizations and undergo evaluations, with the permit itself carrying significant restrictions.

This video discusses the lawsuit Schaefer v. Quatron, filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition, challenging New York's restrictive gun law that prohibits non-residents from obtaining firearm licenses. The lawsuit argues this law violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article 4, by infringing on fundamental constitutional rights when citizens travel across state lines. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the ban is unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement.

A significant legal victory allows non-residents to apply for concealed carry permits in California, stemming from the CRPA v. SD lawsuit. This ruling, while not immediate reciprocity, opens a pathway for US citizens outside California to obtain a license, though the process involves specific training, interviews, and adherence to California's complex firearm laws, including magazine capacity limits and sensitive location restrictions. The process is described as slow, expensive, and time-consuming.

This episode of Gun For Hire Radio features Tony Urena discussing the importance of consistent firearms training, covering topics from basic to advanced techniques. The discussion touches on essential gear and curriculum, including holster draw requirements and the utility of snap caps for dry practice. The hosts emphasize supporting those who support the Second Amendment and encourage listeners to engage with Gun For Hire for their training needs.

This video discusses the unconstitutional nature of California's firearm carry laws for non-residents, highlighting the FPC lawsuit Hoffman v. Bonta. The speaker, a daily carrier in Nevada, explains how crossing into California effectively disarms individuals due to the state's lack of reciprocity and strict transport requirements, forcing firearms into locked safes and unloaded. The discussion emphasizes that Second Amendment rights should apply nationwide, not disappear at state borders.

This video discusses the GOA lawsuit challenging New York's ban on non-resident firearm carry, arguing it violates the Second Amendment as established by the Bruen decision. The lawsuit asserts that the right to bear arms in public for self-defense should not end at state borders. It highlights New York's lack of reciprocity and its restrictive permit process for residents and non-residents alike, potentially leading to national reciprocity if successful.