Videos tagged with Restoration of Rights

The DOJ has initiated a 90-day comment period for a new rule that could allow certain non-violent felons to regain federal firearm rights. This proposal revives a program established by Section 925(c) of the Gun Control Act of 1968, which was defunded in 1992. The new rule outlines strict criteria, including completion of sentence, waiting periods (5-10 years depending on offense), and a clean record post-sentence. The application process will involve an online portal, FBI background checks, and a discretionary decision by the Attorney General. However, federal approval does not guarantee state-level restoration, potentially leading to legal conflicts.

The Trump Department of Justice filed a brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Vincent v. Bondi. The brief argues that the Supreme Court should deny cert, not because Ms. Vincent lacks a strong case for Second Amendment rights restoration, but because an administrative process, established by Attorney General Pam Bondi under 18 USC 925C, now exists for individuals like her to regain their rights. This strategy aims to avoid potentially unfavorable precedent from the Supreme Court on the interpretation of 18 USC 922G concerning non-violent felons and the Second Amendment.

This video discusses a proposed DOJ rule under the Trump administration aimed at restoring Second Amendment rights for individuals convicted of non-violent felonies (one year or greater) or certain misdemeanors (two years or greater). The speaker argues against the lifetime loss of gun rights for such offenses, highlighting the importance of rehabilitation and second chances. Examples of offenses that could lead to permanent loss of rights, such as tax evasion or minor hunting violations, are presented as potentially disproportionate.

The US Department of Justice has published proposed rules to restore Second Amendment rights to certain non-violent felons, a move predicted by constitutional attorney Mark Smith. This administrative process aims to address individuals prohibited from firearm possession under 18 USC 922G, particularly those convicted of non-violent offenses, by focusing on current dangerousness rather than past convictions. The initiative is framed as a restoration of rights consistent with Supreme Court precedent like the Raheem case and Third Circuit rulings.

This video details a significant proposed rule from the Department of Justice (DOJ) aimed at restoring Second Amendment rights for certain individuals with criminal convictions. The rule, published in the Federal Register, bypasses Congress through executive rulemaking and outlines a pathway for relief, with specific exceptions for violent felons, registered sex offenders, and undocumented immigrants. The speaker, an expert firearms instructor, emphasizes the critical importance of the public comment period as a battleground for Second Amendment supporters to engage and influence the outcome.

This video analyzes the case of Melinda Vincent, who lost her Second Amendment rights due to a non-violent felony conviction for writing a bad check. It details her legal battles to regain her rights, the impact of Supreme Court decisions like Bruen, and the ongoing circuit split regarding the constitutionality of felon firearm bans. The discussion highlights the disparity in how non-violent offenses are treated under current gun laws.

John Commerford, NRA-ILA Executive Director, discusses the NRA's legislative priorities and legal battles. Key topics include the push for national reciprocity (HR38), efforts to reform the ATF and DOJ, the impact of the Bruin decision on carry permits, and ongoing litigation challenging 'sensitive places' restrictions and under-21 gun bans. The discussion highlights the importance of voter turnout and vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the Trump administration's initiative to restore Second Amendment rights to individuals previously deemed prohibited persons under federal law. It details the legal framework, specifically 18 USC 925C, which allows for the restoration of firearms disabilities, and how a congressional budget rider preventing the ATF from using funds for this purpose was circumvented by transferring authority to the Attorney General. The publication of the first list of restored rights in the Federal Register is presented as a significant precedent for potentially millions of Americans.

This video explains the process and historical context of restoring Second Amendment rights for individuals who have lost them. It details federal statutes like 18 USC 925C, the role of the Attorney General, and the historical congressional appropriations riders that have hindered the ATF's ability to process these applications. The speaker outlines three categories of individuals who may have their rights restored: non-violent offenders, those convicted of violent crimes, and those in a middle ground, emphasizing the Trump administration's focus on this issue.

This video discusses the complex and sensitive topic of whether individuals with felony convictions should be granted a second chance, particularly in relation to their rights, which can include the right to bear arms. The discussion delves into the legal, ethical, and societal implications of restoring rights, potentially touching upon the intersection of criminal justice reform and Second Amendment protections.

This video discusses the controversial topic of whether felons should be allowed to own guns. The speaker, initially supportive of restrictions, shifted their perspective after experiencing California's strict gun laws and working with individuals convicted of felonies. The core argument is that after serving time and demonstrating rehabilitation, individuals, including former felons, should have their Second Amendment rights restored, especially for non-violent offenses. The speaker emphasizes the need for effective rehabilitation programs to facilitate successful reintegration into society.

This video features Mark W. Smith, a Constitutional Attorney and Top Voice of 2A in America, discussing a significant development in Second Amendment law. The Trump DOJ's decision not to appeal the Brian Range case to the Supreme Court means a Third Circuit ruling, which prevents the permanent disarmament of non-violent felons, will stand. This is framed as a major victory for gun rights, potentially paving the way for administrative restoration of rights.