Videos tagged with Senate Bill 452

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law TV, provides an expert analysis of California's Senate Bill 452, focusing on the implementation of microstamping technology. The law mandates that by January 1, 2028, only semi-automatic pistols equipped with microstamping-enabled firing pins can be sold in California. The Department of Justice has confirmed the technology's viability, but concerns remain about the financial feasibility for manufacturers and the potential for this law to restrict handgun availability, possibly serving as a precursor to broader handgun sales bans.

This video details 12 new pieces of legislation originating from Sacramento, California, that are presented as measures to disarm citizens. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes each bill, explaining its potential impact on firearm ownership and rights. While acknowledging a recent court victory regarding open carry bans, the focus shifts to the legislative threats facing gun owners in California, with predictions that Governor Newsom will sign all 12 bills.

This video features an interview with Rick Travis of the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) discussing numerous legislative battles impacting gun owners in California. Key topics include Assembly Bill 28 (an excise tax on firearms), Senate Bill 2 (post-Bruin carry restrictions), Assembly Bill 262 (a 'study bill' concerning range safety), and other bills targeting firearm parts, private transfers, and microstamping. The discussion highlights the CRPA's efforts to combat these measures through legislative action and legal challenges, emphasizing the importance of voter engagement and organizational membership.

This video discusses two pieces of California legislation: Senate Bill 452 concerning microstamping and AB 262 targeting youth camps, particularly those involving shooting sports. The speakers argue that these bills are politically motivated attempts to restrict gun ownership and participation in shooting activities, rather than genuine safety measures. They highlight concerns about the effectiveness and practicality of microstamping, the potential financial burden on youth camps, and the broader trend of legislation that may be unconstitutional or mismanaged.