Videos tagged with Handgun Ban

This entry details the DOJ's amicus brief challenging Massachusetts' handgun ban, arguing it violates the Second Amendment. The brief, filed in the Granata v. Campbell case, asserts that the state's approved firearms roster unconstitutionally restricts firearms in common use, citing Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen. The DOJ emphasizes that constitutional rights must be exercisable within the state, directly addressing the state's argument about purchasing firearms elsewhere.

This video delves into the legality of mailing handguns, specifically addressing a potential ban by the DOJ. The live stream format suggests an interactive discussion and Q&A session, aiming to clarify complex regulations surrounding firearm shipping. Viewers can expect insights into the current legal landscape affecting firearm ownership and transfer.

Colion Noir, an expert firearms instructor, critically analyzes Canada's self-defense laws and firearm policies. He highlights the perceived inadequacy of Canadian self-defense statutes compared to US standards, particularly in home invasion scenarios. The video also scrutinizes the national handgun freeze and the mandatory gun buyback program, arguing they hinder law-abiding citizens more than criminals.

California has enacted AB 1127, banning the sale of Glock-style pistols, defined by their cruciform trigger bar design, effective January 1, 2026. This legislation, aimed at public safety, is criticized for disproportionately affecting law-abiding gun owners rather than criminals. The video discusses potential federal intervention by the DOJ and President Trump to challenge such state-level restrictions on constitutional rights.

A judge has ordered gun rights organizations, the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition, to provide their membership lists to the Department of Justice as part of the Reese v. ATF case. This case challenges the federal ban on handgun sales to individuals under 21, a ban rooted in the 1968 Gun Control Act. The DOJ's request for membership lists is viewed by Gun Owners of America as an attempt to create a backdoor gun owner registry.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the 'Reese v. ATF' case. It details how a significant Fifth Circuit ruling declaring federal handgun sales bans unconstitutional for 18-20 year olds was undermined by the Department of Justice's proposed judgment. The DOJ's narrow interpretation of the ruling, limiting relief to a specific group and requiring membership lists, has drawn strong criticism from plaintiffs like the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition.

A federal court has ruled that the ban on federally licensed firearms dealers selling handguns and handgun ammunition to adults aged 18-20 is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This ruling, stemming from the Reese v. ATF case, specifically applies within the Fifth Circuit's jurisdiction (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi) to individuals who were members of the plaintiff organizations (SAF, FPC, LSA) at the time the lawsuit was filed. The decision emphasizes that age-based restrictions on the fundamental right to self-defense, without historical precedent, are not permissible.

A federal court has upheld Massachusetts' restrictive handgun roster law, which bans many commonly used firearms for self-defense. The ruling, Granata v. Campbell, was made by Judge Denise Casper, who cited historical precedents for firearm safety regulations. The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) plans to appeal, arguing the decision violates Second Amendment rights and could embolden other states with similar 'backdoor handgun bans'.

This video discusses a federal court's decision to uphold unconstitutional handgun ban laws in Massachusetts. Mark Smith from Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes the ruling. The description highlights the "Massachusetts handgun roster laws" being upheld, implying a significant legal challenge to firearm ownership rights. Smith's background as a frequent Fox News guest and author of several books on gun rights further underscores the political and legal nature of the content.

This video discusses recent actions by the California Department of Justice and state legislature that significantly impact firearm ownership. It details a de facto handgun ban through microstamping requirements, new regulations for the Dealer Record of Sale (DRO) system, and the DOJ's interpretation of featureless grips. The speaker, Reno May, expresses strong criticism of these measures, highlighting their potential to restrict legal firearm transfers and burden law-abiding citizens.

A significant Second Amendment case, West Virginia Citizens Defense League v. ATF, has been filed at the Supreme Court. The case challenges the federal ban on handgun sales to law-abiding adults aged 18-20, arguing it violates constitutional rights. The speaker highlights the existence of a circuit split, with the Fifth Circuit striking down a similar ban and the Fourth Circuit upholding it, increasing the likelihood of Supreme Court acceptance.

This video discusses the legal and societal implications of restricting handgun ownership for individuals aged 18-20. It likely delves into Second Amendment rights, age-based firearm regulations, and public safety debates surrounding handgun accessibility for young adults. The content may explore arguments for and against such restrictions, potentially referencing existing laws and proposed legislation.