Videos tagged with Stun Guns

This video analyzes a Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that ruled stun guns are not 'arms' under the Second Amendment, contradicting Supreme Court precedent in Kitano v. Massachusetts. The speaker, identified as a constitutional attorney and Supreme Court Bar member, argues the court improperly shifted the burden of proof to plaintiffs and misapplied the Bruen methodology by treating legislative facts as adjudicatory facts. The decision is seen as an attempt to circumvent established Second Amendment jurisprudence and is expected to be challenged at the Supreme Court.

This video analyzes the oral arguments in Caley v. New York City, concerning the Second Amendment protection of stun guns. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, argues that lower courts, including the Second Circuit, are misapplying the Bruin methodology by elevating the 'in common use' test to the plain text level. This misapplication, he contends, improperly shifts the burden of proof to Second Amendment claimants, contrary to Supreme Court precedent established in Heller and Bruin. The analysis highlights the potential for an embarrassing reversal by the Supreme Court if the Second Circuit upholds New York City's ban on stun guns.

This video from Gun For Hire Range highlights current popular products in their store. The speaker, demonstrating experienced familiarity with inventory and customer preferences, showcases items ranging from comfortable apparel like hoodies and Kore belts to essential security solutions such as Voltex biometric safes. The segment also covers popular accessories like mag loaders, cleaning products, Savior bags, and self-defense tools, alongside range essentials and portable power banks.

This video analyzes the court's decision in Caliy v. New York City, which upheld New York's ban on stun guns and tasers. The speaker argues that the court bastardized the Bruin test by moving the 'common use' analysis to the first step, effectively eliminating Second Amendment protection for stun guns. The decision is criticized for ignoring Supreme Court precedent like Katanov v. Massachusetts and for its disingenuous application of legal standards to achieve a desired outcome of civilian disarmament.

This video analyzes a federal district court ruling in Colsey v. City of New York, which found stun guns and tasers are not protected by the Second Amendment. The host, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, argues the judge erred by relying on 'weight of authority' from other anti-gun courts and misapplying the Bruen methodology. He emphasizes that the 'common use' test is part of the historical analysis, not the textual analysis, and the burden should be on the government to prove an arm is dangerous and unusual, not on plaintiffs to prove common use.

A federal judge in New York, Edgardo Ramos, has upheld state and city bans on stun guns and tasers, a decision that contradicts national trends and Supreme Court precedent. Judge Ramos ruled that plaintiffs failed to prove common use for these non-lethal self-defense tools, dismissing evidence of widespread ownership and Justice Alito's concurring opinion as non-binding. This ruling is seen as a significant blow to Second Amendment rights, with advocacy groups planning to challenge it.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the state's ban on switchblades is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The court cited the 'common use' test established in Heller, emphasizing that arms protected by the Second Amendment include those in common use for lawful purposes, not just firearms. The ruling draws parallels to the Kitano decision regarding stun guns and highlights the burden of proof on the government to demonstrate an arm is not in common use.

This video, hosted by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, discusses the legality of using non-lethal self-defense tools like pepper spray and stun guns. It clarifies that deploying such items is legally permissible when facing an imminent threat of unlawful force, provided the force used is necessary, reasonable, and proportional. The discussion emphasizes that non-lethal force is analyzed as such, even when used against non-lethal illegal force.

This video provides an expert analysis of recent federal court rulings that expand the interpretation of the Second Amendment to include all types of 'arms,' not just firearms. The speaker, demonstrating high authority on constitutional law, cites specific cases like Maloney v. Singas and Ramirez v. Commonwealth to illustrate how bans on items like nunchucks and stun guns have been deemed unconstitutional. The discussion extends to historical definitions of arms and challenges to regulations on items such as pepper spray and knives, emphasizing a broader legal scope for Second Amendment protections.

This video delves into the historical and legal interpretation of the Second Amendment, specifically focusing on the term 'Arms.' It argues that the amendment protects a broader range of implements than just firearms, referencing historical examples and legal precedents. The content aims to educate viewers on the expansive meaning of the Second Amendment's protections, going beyond common understandings of gun rights to include other weaponry.

This video features a 'Price Is Right' style game show format where hosts guess the retail prices of various tactical and outdoor products. The items range from everyday carry essentials like stun guns and tactical pens to specialized gear such as night vision goggles and hunting calls. The content highlights a diverse array of products available from Classic Firearms, showcasing their pricing and utility.

This video, presented by an attorney and 2A advocate, details the legal challenge to Hawaii's ban on electric arms like stun guns and tasers. It outlines the procedural history, including stays and appeals to the Ninth Circuit, and discusses arguments regarding mootness and the scope of 'arms' under the Second Amendment. The content highlights the Firearms Policy Coalition's involvement in supporting this cause.