Videos tagged with Use of Deadly Force

This video analyzes a New Jersey officer-involved shooting incident captured on badge cam. The hosts, John Korea and Mike Willover from Active Self Protection, discuss the legal ramifications for the officer, who faces aggravated manslaughter charges. They critique the officer's tactics, emphasizing the lack of de-escalation and the failure to utilize less-lethal options despite the presence of numerous officers. The analysis highlights the importance of assessing imminent threats and adhering to training standards in use-of-force situations.

This live stream covers a wide range of firearms, from lever-action rifles like the Henry Big Boy to revolvers like the Ruger GP100 and Colt Python, and various semi-automatic pistols including Glocks, Sigs, and Springfields. The speaker offers opinions on firearm quality, reliability, and value, often comparing different models and brands. Discussions also touch upon ammunition choices for self-defense, legal aspects of using deadly force, and personal carry preferences. The speaker emphasizes practical advice for gun owners, such as the importance of training and choosing firearms that fit individual needs and budgets.

This video discusses a legal case where a Colorado man, Brent Mets, is accused of shooting a 17-year-old. His defense claims the Sig Sauer P320 discharged accidentally while being holstered, not due to intentional action. The case highlights legal nuances regarding the use of deadly force for property defense in Colorado and the controversial history of the Sig P320's alleged accidental discharges.

This video analyzes a carjacking incident where a rideshare driver, an off-duty police officer, used deadly force against multiple assailants. Expert John Correia breaks down the event, emphasizing the universal right to self-defense, the risks associated with rideshare driving, and crucial legal nuances like 'disparity of force.' The analysis highlights the importance of being armed, staying at the scene after an incident, and invoking the right to remain silent and seek legal counsel immediately.

This video discusses the perceived militarization of the IRS, focusing on their acquisition of firearms, including P90 submachine guns, Glocks, shotguns, and millions of rounds of ammunition. The speaker argues that while IRS criminal investigators may need sidearms for safety, the extensive arsenal suggests a broader purpose beyond typical tax fraud investigations, potentially related to asset forfeiture and the use of force. The speaker advocates for these investigative functions to be handled by the DOJ or FBI.

This video, featuring attorney Andrew Branca, breaks down the legalities of using deadly force against a home intruder. It emphasizes that while the 'Castle Doctrine' generally presumes a reasonable fear of imminent deadly harm when someone forcibly and unlawfully enters your home, the specifics of the situation are crucial. The discussion highlights the importance of identifying threats, the role of verbal commands in de-escalation, and the legal presumption that can be overcome by an intruder's retreat or non-malicious intent.

This video, presented by Hegshot87, analyzes a scenario involving car thieves attempting to steal a vehicle while armed. It emphasizes that while protecting property is important, using deadly force is typically only justified when there's an imminent threat to life. The instructor highlights the critical differences in legal interpretations of self-defense laws like Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground across various states, particularly concerning property versus life threats and the impact of occupied vehicles or forced entry.

This video analyzes a controversial self-defense shooting in Houston, Texas. The instructor discusses the concealed carrier's actions, the legal justification for the initial shots, and the potential issues with subsequent shots. It highlights the importance of situational awareness, the role of video evidence in legal proceedings, and the nuances of self-defense laws like Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video features Colion Noir discussing a critical incident where an Amazon driver used a firearm to defend against a carjacking attempt. Noir, an expert in Second Amendment law and firearm advocacy, provides insights into the legalities of self-defense in Ohio, emphasizing that deadly force is permissible for personal safety threats, not just property. He also highlights the conflict between driver safety needs and corporate policies that may prohibit firearm carriage.

This video provides crucial information for gun owners regarding the legal use of deadly force in self-defense and the subsequent legal and personal aftermath. It emphasizes the 'totality of the circumstances' and the requirement of a reasonable belief of imminent threat of death or great bodily harm, defined by the attacker possessing a weapon, intent, and ability. The video also details the critical steps to take immediately after a self-defense incident, including safety, calling 911 with specific communication guidelines, and the absolute necessity of consulting an attorney before speaking with law enforcement.

This video critically examines a recent ATF raid that resulted in a fatality, questioning the necessity of a 6 AM dawn raid on an individual with no prior violent history. It highlights how the Senate Safer Communities Act of 2022 may have influenced the ATF's redefinition of federal firearms dealers and the subsequent enforcement actions, raising concerns about law enforcement tactics and accountability.

Delaware Senate Bill 2 introduces a comprehensive licensing regime for handgun purchases, requiring applicants to obtain a 'handgun qualified purchase permit'. This involves background checks, fingerprinting, and extensive state-certified training covering safe handling, live fire exercises (minimum 100 rounds), legal knowledge, conflict resolution, and suicide prevention. The bill mandates the collection of personal data including race, ethnicity, and national origin, and requires law enforcement to verify residency across multiple jurisdictions if applicable. Critics argue this creates an unnecessary barrier to an inalienable right and facilitates civilian disarmament.