2016 “Gunmageddon” and the Moment She’d Had Enough

Published on March 8, 2026
Duration: 1:13

This video features a plaintiff discussing their involvement in a lawsuit challenging California's 2016 magazine ban. The guest explains their motivation stemmed from witnessing legal issues faced by veterans and others for owning standard capacity magazines. The discussion highlights the unique nature of California's laws regarding magazine capacity compared to other states.

Quick Summary

California's 2016 "Gunmageddon" legislation led to a ban on certain firearm magazines. Plaintiffs in the subsequent lawsuit were motivated by the perceived injustice of veterans and others facing legal issues for owning standard capacity magazines, which are common elsewhere.

Chapters

  1. 00:002016 California Magazine Ban Lawsuit
  2. 00:18Reasons for Lawsuit Involvement
  3. 00:41Right to Standard Capacity Magazines

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the "Gunmageddon" event in California?

The "Gunmageddon" refers to the period surrounding the implementation of stricter gun control laws in California in 2016, notably including a ban on certain types of firearm magazines, which led to significant legal challenges.

Why did individuals become plaintiffs in the California magazine ban lawsuit?

Plaintiffs were motivated by the belief that it was wrong for military veterans and others to face legal repercussions for owning standard capacity magazines, which are common in other states.

How do California's magazine laws differ from other states?

California is unique in requiring firearm manufacturers to supply firearms with minimum round magazines. In contrast, many other states allow standard handgun magazines to hold 15 or 17 rounds.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →