2024 Could be Bad, LETS CHANGE THAT!

Published on November 17, 2023
Duration: 29:40

This video discusses several pieces of proposed legislation in California that could impact firearm owners and related communities. Rick Travis, Legislative Director for CRPA, explains the nature of two-year bills and details specific proposals concerning gun-free zones (AB 851), animal protection and police canine policies (AB 554, AB 742), voluntary firearm registries (AB 1047, AB 29), and regulations for children's camps with shooting ranges (AB 262). The discussion emphasizes the potential negative consequences of these bills, arguing they could disarm law-abiding citizens and create unintended problems.

Quick Summary

California's legislative sessions are two-year cycles, allowing bills to be carried over. Proposed legislation like AB 851 (gun-free zones) and AB 742 (police K9 policy) are viewed by CRPA as potentially disarming law-abiding citizens and weakening self-defense capabilities, while voluntary registries like AB 1047 and AB 29 are seen as insidious steps towards greater control.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: 2024 Legislation Preview
  2. 01:31Understanding Two-Year Bills in California
  3. 03:58Analysis of AB 851: Gun-Free Zones
  4. 09:57Concerns Regarding Animal Protection Bills (AB 554, AB 742)
  5. 17:10Critique of Voluntary Registries (AB 1047, AB 29)
  6. 23:15Examining Children's Camp Regulations (AB 262)
  7. 28:06Looking Ahead: January Session & Advocacy

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a two-year bill in California legislation?

In California, legislative sessions span two years. A two-year bill is one that did not meet its deadline in the first year of the session, allowing it to be 'parked' and revived for consideration in the second year, often with the author able to push it forward at opportune moments.

How do proposed gun-free zones like AB 851 potentially impact residents?

AB 851 proposed a gun-free zone in Sacramento, which could turn legally armed residents in apartments or condos into criminals overnight if the law is enacted, raising concerns about property rights and self-defense.

What are the concerns surrounding AB 742 regarding police canines?

AB 742 sought to limit police canines' biting ability to only life-threatening situations. This is viewed by some as a tactic to weaken law enforcement's capabilities, potentially paving the way for further restrictions on citizen self-defense tools.

Why are voluntary firearm registries like AB 1047 and AB 29 considered problematic?

These bills are seen as 'death by a thousand cuts.' AB 1047 would notify family of firearm purchases, and AB 29 creates a voluntary registry for the 'do not sell' list. Critics argue they create unnecessary tracking and could be precursors to mandatory registration or confiscation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →