40 Brace Ban Facts YOU DON’T KNOW | MMM Ep. 40

Published on September 24, 2021
Duration: 7:16

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) breaks down the ATF's proposed rule on pistol braces, highlighting its perceived flaws and potential impact. It argues the rule is a power grab, contradicts prior ATF guidance, and creates arbitrary new regulations. GOA emphasizes the importance of understanding the law and policy to defend against such measures.

Quick Summary

The ATF's proposed rule on pistol braces is criticized as a power grab that contradicts prior guidance and arbitrarily creates new regulations, potentially making millions of Americans felons. It allegedly violates statutory law by focusing solely on design and intent for firearm classification and ignores the practical use of braces for two-handed firing.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Context
  2. 00:16ATF Proposed Rule on Pistol Braces
  3. 00:51Two Approaches to Discussing the Rule
  4. 01:05The Future of Pistol Brace Regulations
  5. 01:48Flaws in the Proposed Rule: Acknowledgment and Justification
  6. 01:56ATF's Changed Course on Stabilizing Braces
  7. 02:09Conflict with Prior ATF Guidance
  8. 02:26Blanket Ban on Stabilizing Braces
  9. 02:38Procedural Requirements and Felon Creation
  10. 02:52Power Grab by ATF, DOJ, and White House
  11. 03:00The ATF's Worksheet and Test
  12. 03:14Form 49999 Section 1: Prerequisites
  13. 03:30Form 49999 Section 2: Accessory Characteristics
  14. 04:01Form 49999 Section 3: Configuration of a Weapon
  15. 04:11Ability to Say No Despite Passing Test
  16. 04:18Violation of Plain Text of Statute
  17. 04:39Unreliable ATF Classifications
  18. 04:48Regulatory Impact Analysis as a Smoke Screen
  19. 04:55Disingenuous Claims of Assistance
  20. 05:15Pulling the Rug Out from the Industry
  21. 05:25Conflicting Numbers on Brace Purchases
  22. 05:39Congressional Research Service Estimates
  23. 05:46Flawed Estimates of Effects
  24. 05:51Seizing, Wasting, and Destroying Commerce
  25. 06:02Lack of Realistic Benefits
  26. 06:07Reversing Over a Decade of ATF Classifications
  27. 06:12Misassumption About Brace Usage on Pistols
  28. 06:25Reality of Two-Handed Non-Shoulder Fire
  29. 06:32Legal Distinctions and Rule Failure
  30. 06:44Undermining the Entire Proposed Rule
  31. 06:51Conclusion and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ATF's proposed rule on pistol braces primarily criticized for?

The ATF's proposed rule on pistol braces is criticized for being a power grab, contradicting previous ATF guidance, and failing to meet procedural requirements for rulemaking. Critics argue it arbitrarily creates new regulations and potentially millions of felons.

How does the ATF's proposed rule on pistol braces allegedly violate statutory law?

The proposed rule is accused of violating the plain text of the statute by treating firearm design and intent alone as determinative for classification as a rifle, without requiring evidence of both, which is contrary to legal definitions.

What is the estimated number of firearm braces that could be affected by the ATF's proposed rule?

According to the Congressional Research Service, an estimated 40 million firearm braces could be affected by the ATF's proposed rule, highlighting the significant potential impact on gun owners and the industry.

Does the ATF's proposed rule acknowledge the use of pistol braces for two-handed firing?

No, the ATF's proposed rule allegedly ignores the reality that stabilizing braces can be used to support two-handed, non-shoulder fire, focusing instead on a narrow interpretation of their use.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →