A 1000% Gun Tax, the 28th Amendment And Other Stuff That Is Never Going to Happen

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes two highly improbable legislative proposals: HR 5315, a 1000% excise tax on semi-automatic firearms, and Gavin Newsom's 'Right to Safety Amendment' (28th Amendment). Kirk explains the legislative hurdles and political realities making both unlikely to pass, highlighting the potential risks of a constitutional convention for gun rights advocates.

Quick Summary

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes HR 5315 (1000% gun tax) and Gavin Newsom's 28th Amendment. He explains these proposals are unlikely due to political realities and legislative challenges, noting the significant risks a Constitutional Convention poses to gun rights.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: 1000% Gun Tax & 28th Amendment
  2. 01:03HR 5315: The 1000% Excise Tax Explained
  3. 02:22Legislative Intent vs. Political Reality of HR 5315
  4. 04:16Gavin Newsom's 28th Amendment: A Political Move?
  5. 05:03The Constitutional Convention Risk for Gun Rights
  6. 06:07Conclusion: Improbable Proposals

Frequently Asked Questions

What is HR 5315 and its proposed impact on firearm costs?

HR 5315, sponsored by Rep. Don Beyer, proposes a 1000% excise tax on semi-automatic firearms defined as 'assault weapons.' This would significantly increase prices, turning a $500 rifle into $5,500 and a $2,000 rifle into $22,000.

What is Gavin Newsom's 'Right to Safety Amendment' (28th Amendment)?

Gavin Newsom's proposal, often called the 28th Amendment, aims to establish a 'right to safety.' However, legal experts like William Kirk suggest it's primarily a political tool and that the Second Amendment already covers self-defense rights.

Why are the 1000% gun tax and the 28th Amendment unlikely to pass?

These proposals face significant political hurdles. HR 5315 is unlikely due to the current House and Senate majorities, especially in an election year. Newsom's 28th Amendment requires a Constitutional Convention, which carries risks for gun rights advocates and lacks broad support.

What are the risks associated with a Constitutional Convention for gun rights?

Convening a Constitutional Convention, needed for the 28th Amendment, could open the door to amendments gun rights supporters oppose. A key concern is the potential for national Constitutional Carry, which might have more state support than the 28th Amendment itself.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →