A Major Updates on Senstive Place Challenges

Published on March 22, 2026
Duration: 11:36

This video, presented by William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides an expert analysis of ongoing legal challenges to 'sensitive place' restrictions on firearm carry. It details two key cases, *Schoenthal v. Raoul* and *Goldberger v. James*, examining how these challenges aim to prevent the overbroad designation of gun-free zones and uphold Second Amendment rights in public spaces, particularly in light of the *NYSRPA v. Bruen* Supreme Court decision.

Quick Summary

The *Goldberger v. James* case challenges New York's Times Square carry ban, arguing it was enacted in defiance of the *Bruen* decision. This case questions whether Times Square, a crowded public area, can be constitutionally designated a 'sensitive place' where firearms are prohibited, even for licensed carriers, and whether such designations align with historical traditions.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Sensitive Place Challenges
  2. 00:42Importance of Sensitive Place Cases
  3. 00:56Schoenthal v. Raoul Case
  4. 01:11Goldberger v. James Case
  5. 01:31Defining Sensitive Place Parameters
  6. 01:48Schoenthal v. Raoul Status Update
  7. 02:55Roberts Court and Lower Court Compliance
  8. 03:15Goldberger v. James: Times Square Ban
  9. 03:42New York's Retaliatory Law
  10. 04:53Times Square Ban Mocks Bruen
  11. 06:26Broad Implications of Sensitive Place Definition
  12. 06:40Penalties for Violating NY Law
  13. 07:00Applying the Bruen Test
  14. 07:31Historical Tradition of Sensitive Places
  15. 08:37New York's Shifting Definition of Times Square
  16. 09:05Goldberger as Ideal Plaintiff
  17. 09:54Requested Remedies in Goldberger v. James
  18. 10:19Conclusion and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What are 'sensitive places' in the context of Second Amendment law?

'Sensitive places' are locations where firearm carry may be restricted, such as courthouses or schools. The legal debate, highlighted by cases like *Goldberger v. James*, centers on whether modern designations, like New York's Times Square ban, align with historical traditions of such restrictions as interpreted by the Supreme Court in *Bruen*.

How did the *NYSRPA v. Bruen* decision impact gun laws in New York?

The *NYSRPA v. Bruen* decision affirmed the right to carry handguns for self-defense outside the home. In response, New York enacted the Concealed Carry Improvement Act, which includes broad 'sensitive place' designations, like the Times Square ban, that are now being legally challenged.

What is the significance of the *Goldberger v. James* case?

*Goldberger v. James* challenges New York's Times Square carry ban, arguing it was enacted in defiance of the *Bruen* decision. The case questions whether Times Square, a crowded public area, can be constitutionally designated a 'sensitive place' where firearms are prohibited, even for licensed carriers.

What is a G.V.R. (Grant, Vacate, Remand) in legal proceedings?

A G.V.R. is a Supreme Court procedure where a lower court's decision is vacated (canceled) and the case is sent back for reconsideration, often due to a new Supreme Court ruling like *Bruen*. This is anticipated in cases like *Schoenthal v. Raoul*.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →