California DOJ Gun Confiscation with Sam Paredes of GOC

Published on February 26, 2019
Duration: 64:39

This video features a discussion between Joel Persinger of GunGuyTV and Sam Paredes of Gun Owners of California regarding the California Department of Justice's (DOJ) firearm confiscation practices. They detail instances where individuals attempting to comply with registration laws faced confiscation due to minor procedural errors, often without due process. The conversation highlights internal DOJ contention, the challenges faced by law enforcement agents, and the broader implications for Second Amendment rights in California and nationwide. Legal strategies, including upcoming Supreme Court cases and the importance of advocacy, are also discussed.

Quick Summary

The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is reportedly confiscating firearms from individuals who make minor procedural errors during registration, often without due process. Internal DOJ agents reportedly disagree with these tactics, preferring to issue correction notices. This practice, along with the complexity of California's gun laws and the perceived function of registration as a confiscation tool, raises significant Second Amendment concerns.

Chapters

  1. 00:09Introduction: CA DOJ Gun Confiscation
  2. 00:48Case Study: San Diego County Confiscation
  3. 01:40Internal DOJ Contention & Agent Concerns
  4. 03:18Other Confiscation Incidents
  5. 04:07Problems with Due Process & Common Sense
  6. 06:01The Armed Prohibited Persons System (APPS)
  7. 08:03Lack of Search Warrants & Enforcement Tactics
  8. 10:01APPS Backlog & Funding Issues
  9. 11:00Investigator Turnover & Program Flaws
  10. 13:00Complexity of California Gun Laws
  11. 14:00Registration: Crime Reduction vs. Confiscation
  12. 14:51Real ID and Firearm Purchases
  13. 17:24Backdoor Confiscation via Anti-2A Laws
  14. 19:06CCW Holders: Scrutiny and Monitoring
  15. 20:31Protesting in Sacramento: Armed vs. Political Action
  16. 21:13Legal Battles: The Path Forward
  17. 31:14Supreme Court Cases to Watch
  18. 34:24Impact of Supreme Court Rulings on Scrutiny
  19. 39:26Overturning California Gun Laws
  20. 41:00Advice for Dealing with DOJ Knock-and-Talks
  21. 43:32Constitutional Officers and CCW Enforcement
  22. 47:40How to Support the Fight for 2A Rights
  23. 53:08Running for Office vs. Grassroots Advocacy
  24. 54:19DOJ vs. ATF: Confiscation Authority
  25. 55:48Federal Bill to Ban Semi-Automatics
  26. 56:46Pushing DOJ to Change Policy
  27. 58:07Critique of the NRA and Advocacy Groups
  28. 60:02Comparing Gun Laws Across States
  29. 61:21Call to Action: Support the Fight
  30. 62:02Channel Guidelines: Family-Friendly Content
  31. 62:53Concluding Remarks & Encouragement

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main concerns regarding California DOJ firearm confiscation?

The primary concerns involve the California Department of Justice (DOJ) confiscating firearms from individuals who made minor procedural errors during registration, often without due process. There's also internal contention among DOJ agents who disagree with these enforcement tactics, preferring to issue correction notices instead of immediate confiscation and potential arrest.

How does the California DOJ's Armed Prohibited Persons System (APPS) operate?

The APPS program cross-references individuals with disqualifying criminal convictions against firearm purchase records. The goal is to identify and remove firearms from prohibited persons. However, enforcement methods, including the lack of search warrants and aggressive tactics, have drawn criticism.

What is the role of registration in California firearm laws according to this discussion?

The discussion suggests that firearm registration in California, through systems like the Dealer Record of Sale (DROS) and assault weapons databases, does not effectively reduce crime. Instead, it is viewed as a mechanism that primarily facilitates government confiscation of firearms.

What legal avenues are being pursued to challenge California's gun laws?

Several cases challenging California's gun laws are heading to the Supreme Court, including those addressing firearm transportation restrictions, assault weapons bans, and the National Firearms Act. The hope is that the Supreme Court will adopt a stricter standard of review based on text, history, and tradition, potentially overturning many existing laws.

What advice is given to Californians facing potential DOJ firearm confiscation?

If DOJ agents arrive without a warrant, it's advised not to answer the door. If you do answer and realize officers are present, remain silent. For AR-15 style firearms, if officers have a warrant, disassembling the firearm by separating the upper and lower receivers can render it non-functional, potentially avoiding a violation.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from GunGuyTV

View all →