California Law Backfires And Its Hilarious, Rhode v. Bonta

Published on July 20, 2023
Duration: 5:27

This video discusses the unintended consequences of California's ammunition background check system, which requires a fee and a check for every ammunition purchase. The system's complexity and fees are reportedly leading some Californians to purchase more firearms to ensure their information is up-to-date in the state's system, thus backfiring on the law's intent to discourage ownership. The ongoing lawsuit Rhode v. Bonta, heard by Judge Roger T. Benitez, aims to overturn this law.

Quick Summary

California's ammunition background check law, requiring a fee and check for every ammo purchase, is reportedly backfiring. The system's complexity and costs are leading some residents to buy more firearms to update their information in the state's CFARS system, contrary to the law's intent to discourage ownership. The lawsuit Rhode v. Bonta aims to overturn this law.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to California's Ammo Background Check Law
  2. 00:19USCCA Sponsorship Mention
  3. 00:43Details of California's Ammunition Background Check System
  4. 01:34Two Levels of Background Checks Explained
  5. 02:22How the Law is Backfiring: Buying More Firearms
  6. 03:06Scenario: Moving and Address Mismatches
  7. 04:01The Rhode v. Bonta Lawsuit
  8. 04:43Judge Benitez's Involvement and Timeline
  9. 05:04Conclusion: Law's Opposite Effect

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main issue with California's ammunition background check law?

California's law requires a background check and fee for every ammunition purchase. This system is complex and costly, leading to unintended consequences where individuals are reportedly buying more firearms to update their information in the state's system, thus backfiring on the law's intent.

How does California's ammunition background check system work?

In California, purchasing ammunition requires a background check. There's a $1 fee for individuals already in the CFARS system. If your information isn't current or doesn't match, a more extensive $19 background check is required for each transaction.

What is the Rhode v. Bonta lawsuit about?

The Rhode v. Bonta lawsuit challenges California's ammunition background check system, arguing that it is unconstitutional. The case is being heard by Judge Roger T. Benitez, and its outcome could lead to the law being overturned.

Why are Californians reportedly buying more firearms due to the ammo background check law?

The ammunition background check law's fees and system complexities, especially when addresses change, make it difficult to purchase ammo. To resolve these issues and ensure their information is current, some Californians are opting to buy new firearms, which then updates their records in the state's system.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →