GREAT NEWS! ATF HUMILIATED In Court! Pistol Brace Rule UNCONSTITUTIONAL! But Wait...There's MORE!!

Published on August 2, 2023
Duration: 16:50

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled the ATF's pistol brace rule unconstitutional, finding it violates the Administrative Procedure Act and fails the Bruen test. This decision stems from lawsuits filed by Gun Owners of America and the Firearms Policy Coalition. The court reversed a previous denial of a preliminary injunction, remanding the case for further action, and highlighted the NFA's original intent and the lack of evidence supporting the ATF's claims.

Quick Summary

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled the ATF's pistol brace rule unconstitutional, finding it violates the Administrative Procedure Act and fails the Bruen test. This landmark decision stems from lawsuits by Gun Owners of America and the Firearms Policy Coalition, reversing a prior denial of a preliminary injunction.

Chapters

  1. 00:00ATF Pistol Brace Rule Humiliated
  2. 01:25Lawsuit Updates: GOA and FPC
  3. 03:20NFA Historical Context and Intent
  4. 04:38APA Violations Found
  5. 05:55Preliminary Injunction Success Likelihood
  6. 08:38Court Reversal and Remand
  7. 10:28Judge Willett's Concurring Opinion
  8. 12:54ATF Statistics vs Real World
  9. 14:46Judge O'Connor's Immediate Response

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on the ATF's pistol brace rule?

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the ATF's pistol brace rule illegal and unconstitutional. The court found it violates the Administrative Procedure Act and fails the Bruen test, reversing a previous denial of a preliminary injunction.

Which lawsuits were central to the Fifth Circuit's ruling on pistol braces?

The ruling was significantly influenced by lawsuits filed by Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). These cases, particularly Mock v. Garland, were pivotal in challenging the ATF's rule.

What are the key legal arguments against the ATF's pistol brace rule?

The ATF's rule was found to be legislative in character, not interpretive, violating the APA's logical-outgrowth test. Additionally, it was deemed to fail the Bruen test, which requires firearm regulations to be consistent with historical tradition.

What is the historical context of the National Firearms Act (NFA) regarding firearms like pistols with braces?

The NFA was originally intended to target gangsters. Its text specifically exempts pistols or revolvers with rifled bores, a distinction that became relevant in the legal challenge against the ATF's pistol brace rule.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →