Here is Why Businesses are Leaving California

Published on September 16, 2023
Duration: 20:19

This video discusses two key pieces of California legislation impacting firearms businesses and rights. Assembly Bill 262, targeting ranges and camps, was successfully defeated for the session. Senate Bill 1384, however, mandates extensive video surveillance for all FFLs starting January 1, 2024, imposing significant financial and operational burdens. The discussion highlights concerns about over-regulation driving businesses out of the state and the perceived targeting of law-abiding citizens and businesses.

Quick Summary

California FFLs must comply with Senate Bill 1384 by January 1, 2024, requiring 24/7 video surveillance at 15 FPS. Estimated annual data storage costs range from $8,000-$14,000 for local drives or $26,000 for cloud storage, excluding hardware and potential insurance.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & AB 262 Update
  2. 01:01Assembly Bill 262 Defeated
  3. 03:15Legislative Process & Expert Consultation
  4. 06:55Sponsor: The Police Credit Union
  5. 07:40Senate Bill 1384: FFL Surveillance Law
  6. 08:53SB 1384 Requirements Explained
  7. 11:38Cost Breakdown: Data Storage for SB 1384
  8. 13:50Overall Impact of SB 1384 on FFLs
  9. 17:39Seeking Solutions for FFLs
  10. 18:33Final Thoughts & DOJ Focus
  11. 19:56Call to Action: Like, Share, Subscribe

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Senate Bill 1384 and when does it take effect for California FFLs?

Senate Bill 1384 mandates that all licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) in California must install and maintain a digital video surveillance system. This system must continuously record 24/7 at a minimum of 15 frames per second, covering all entry/exit points, firearm display areas, and sales transactions. It becomes effective on January 1, 2024.

What are the estimated costs associated with complying with California's SB 1384 surveillance law?

The costs for SB 1384 compliance are significant. Data storage alone for six cameras recording 24/7 at 15 FPS for a year could range from $8,000 to $14,000 for local drives, or $26,000 annually for cloud storage. This excludes the cost of cameras, installation, and potential additional insurance requirements.

Why was Assembly Bill 262 opposed by firearms organizations in California?

Assembly Bill 262, initially focused on camp safety, was seen by firearms organizations like CRPA as a backdoor attempt to regulate shooting ranges. They opposed it due to concerns about its potential impact on range activities and the lack of consultation with experienced firearms safety organizations.

What is the perceived impact of California's regulatory environment on businesses?

The video suggests that California's extensive and often burdensome regulations, exemplified by bills like SB 1384, are a primary reason why businesses, including firearms dealers, are choosing to leave the state. This creates an environment where compliance costs can become prohibitive.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →