How They'll Eat Their Own to Disarm You

This video discusses the critical legal battle in Oregon concerning Ballot Measure 114, which is currently before the State Supreme Court in the case of Arnold v. Kotek. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains the stakes involved and argues that requiring government permission to exercise a fundamental right negates its very nature. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides a link to listen to the oral arguments live, as well as resources for subscribing to their newsletter and contacting Washington Gun Law for further information. It highlights this as Oregon's final opportunity to protect its constitutional rights.

Oregon has enacted new gun laws, including SB 243, which bans rapid fire devices like binary triggers and bump stocks, effective September 26th. The state is also implementing pre-purchasing licensing requirements under Ballot Measure 114, with an activation date of March 15th, 2026. Violations for manufacturing or transporting banned items can result in a felony, while mere possession is a misdemeanor.

This YouTube video features Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, providing a live discussion on significant updates regarding Oregon Ballot Measure 114. The content focuses on a recent ruling from Harney County pertaining to this measure. Links are provided to read the opinion, subscribe to their Rumble and Patreon channels, and follow them on their website, Facebook, and Twitter.

This video discusses the legal challenge to Oregon's Ballot Measure 114, titled Oregon Firearms Federation v. Kotek. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, details the case, highlighting the significant testimony provided by Massad Ayoob. The trial is scheduled to commence on June 5th, and the video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this measure for their Second Amendment rights. Contact information for Washington Gun Law is provided for further assistance.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the lawsuit challenging Oregon Ballot Measure 114, highlighting it as potentially the most restrictive gun control legislation enacted by a state. The video details the case "Oregon Firearms Federation v. Brown," filed in the US District Court, which attacks the measure from multiple legal angles supported by recent case law. With the measure set to become effective on December 8, 2022, the discussion emphasizes the urgency for citizens to educate themselves on the implications. The description also links to several supporting organizations and related videos offering deeper insights into the measure and its impact.

This Gun Talk Radio episode discusses Oregon's Ballot Measure 114, labeling it a "disaster" for gun owners and stores. Host Tom Gresham and guest Ron Willis analyze the potential impact of the measure, which is currently facing a federal injunction and a judge's review. The discussion highlights concerns about the measure's validity and its effects on the firearms community in Oregon. The episode also features call-ins providing firsthand accounts from the state.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.