NFA IN BIG TROUBLE! MASSIVE CHANGE TO LEGALIZE ALL MACHINE GUNS!

Published on February 25, 2026
Duration: 19:47

This video discusses a proposed West Virginia law that could allow the state to sell or transfer post-1986 machine guns to private citizens. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, argues this initiative could challenge the constitutionality of the federal Hughes Amendment (18 USC 922) by highlighting its lack of a clear jurisdictional hook to Article One of the Constitution. The strategy involves a two-pronged legal defense: first, arguing compliance with the Hughes Amendment, and second, asserting the amendment's unconstitutionality due to a lack of connection to interstate commerce powers.

Quick Summary

West Virginia's proposed law to sell post-1986 machine guns could challenge the federal Hughes Amendment. The strategy involves arguing compliance with the amendment's state government exception and, alternatively, asserting the amendment's unconstitutionality due to a lack of connection to Congress's Article One powers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Hughes Amendment and what does it do?

The Hughes Amendment, enacted in 1986, is a federal law that prohibits American citizens from acquiring machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986. This means only machine guns made before that date are generally available for civilian ownership, subject to NFA regulations.

How could West Virginia's proposed law challenge the Hughes Amendment?

West Virginia's proposed law, which would allow the state to sell post-1986 machine guns to citizens, could challenge the Hughes Amendment by leveraging an exception for state governments. Furthermore, it could prompt a legal argument that the Hughes Amendment itself is unconstitutional due to a lack of connection to Congress's enumerated powers.

What is the primary legal argument against the Hughes Amendment's constitutionality?

The main constitutional challenge to the Hughes Amendment is that it lacks a sufficient jurisdictional hook to Article One of the U.S. Constitution. Critics argue Congress did not have the enumerated power to enact such a broad prohibition on intrastate firearm possession without a clear link to interstate commerce.

What are the two main legal arguments West Virginia attorneys might use in a challenge?

West Virginia attorneys would likely argue first that their proposed law complies with the Hughes Amendment's exceptions for state governments. Their alternative argument would be that the Hughes Amendment itself is unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable, meaning no compliance is necessary.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from The Four Boxes Diner

View all →