Official Response to newest Bloomberg Gun Propaganda video... You ready to NUKE IT FROM ORBIT!?

Published on August 20, 2023
Duration: 9:39

This video provides a critical response to a Bloomberg-backed propaganda video from 'Doctors for Gun Control.' The speaker, Braden from Langley Outdoors Academy, refutes claims that guns are the leading cause of death for children, arguing that the data is manipulated by including 18-20 year olds and misrepresenting mass shooting statistics. He criticizes the framing of gun violence as a public health issue, asserting it's a crime issue and that the 'public health' approach is a guise for gun control policies aligned with the far left.

Quick Summary

The claim that guns are the leading cause of death for children is disputed due to alleged data manipulation, specifically by including 18-20 year olds in the 'children' demographic. Framing gun violence as a 'public health issue' is criticized as a tactic to advance gun control legislation, masking a far-left political agenda.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Responding to Bloomberg Propaganda
  2. 01:03Debunking the 'Guns as #1 Cause of Child Death' Lie
  3. 02:22Data Manipulation: Including Adults as Children
  4. 03:03Everytown's Misleading Statistics
  5. 03:42Gun Violence as a Public Health Issue: A Tactic
  6. 04:32Critique of the 'Public Health' Framing
  7. 05:13Political Alignment of Gun Control Agendas
  8. 05:57Refuting Gun Violence Archive Claims
  9. 06:31Gun Violence vs. Public Health Issue
  10. 07:06Safer Cars vs. Gun Safety Legislation
  11. 07:27Recognizing Leftist Political Language
  12. 07:55Comparing Guns to Tobacco and Seat Belts
  13. 08:27Lack of Evidence for Gun Safety Policies
  14. 08:44The AAP's 'No Gun in Home' Recommendation
  15. 09:01Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Doctors' Agenda
  16. 09:21Conclusion: Countering Full Bore Propaganda

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument against the claim that guns are the leading cause of death for children?

The primary argument is that the statistics are manipulated by including 18-20 year olds, who are legally adults, in the 'children' demographic. This inflates the numbers to falsely portray guns as the leading cause of death for actual children.

Why is framing gun violence as a 'public health issue' criticized?

Critics argue that framing gun violence as a public health issue is a tactic to push gun control legislation. They believe it distracts from addressing the root causes of crime and is used to advance a political agenda rather than solve a health crisis.

What is the role of the Gun Violence Archive in this debate?

The Gun Violence Archive is described as a propaganda tool. Its definitions, particularly for 'mass shooting,' are said to be designed to inflate numbers and create a misleading narrative that supports gun control advocacy.

How are gun control advocates accused of using political language?

Advocates are accused of using phrases like 'create meaningful change' and framing issues as non-partisan ('not a Democrat or Republican issue') to mask that their policy proposals are aligned with the far left and advance a specific political agenda.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →