Rare Breed FORCED to give YOUR INFORMATION to BDU?

Published on September 6, 2022
Duration: 10:33

This video clarifies the legal dispute between Rare Breed and Big Daddy Unlimited (BDU) regarding customer information in a patent infringement lawsuit over the FRT-15 trigger. BDU is seeking unredacted customer service emails from Rare Breed to assess damages and argue they couldn't meet demand. Rare Breed, citing a digital shredding policy and potential customer backlash against BDU, is resisting this disclosure. The video debunks claims that BDU wants to make customer information public, stating it would only be accessible to lawyers.

Quick Summary

In the Rare Breed vs. Big Daddy Unlimited patent infringement lawsuit, BDU seeks unredacted customer service emails from Rare Breed to argue they shouldn't be liable for damages due to Rare Breed's inability to meet FRT-15 trigger demand. Rare Breed resists, citing a digital shredding policy and potential customer backlash against BDU, stating the information would only be accessible to lawyers.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Rare Breed vs. BDU Lawsuit
  2. 00:26BDU's Motion to Compel Customer Information
  3. 01:00Debunking Misinformation about BDU's Claims
  4. 01:13Specifics of BDU's Information Request
  5. 02:03Privacy Concerns Regarding Customer Data
  6. 02:33Rare Breed's Stance on Customer Information
  7. 03:00Rare Breed Lawyer's Email to BDU
  8. 03:31Rare Breed's Digital Shredding Policy
  9. 04:15BDU's Rationale for Requesting Data
  10. 05:28Allegations of Withholding Information to Avoid Backlash
  11. 05:51Rare Breed's Warning to BDU's Lawyers
  12. 06:11Customer Privacy Concerns with BDU
  13. 07:25Rare Breed's True Reason for Withholding Data
  14. 07:53Rare Breed's Proposal for Information Exchange
  15. 09:00Clarifying Rare Breed's 'Threat'
  16. 09:39BDU's Motion to Force Information Disclosure
  17. 09:53Conclusion: Understanding the Legal Dispute

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core legal dispute between Rare Breed and Big Daddy Unlimited (BDU) regarding customer information?

The core dispute is BDU's motion to compel Rare Breed to provide unredacted customer service emails from the FRT-15 trigger sales. BDU seeks this data for their patent infringement lawsuit defense, aiming to prove they shouldn't be liable for damages because Rare Breed couldn't meet demand.

Why is Rare Breed hesitant to provide customer information to BDU?

Rare Breed cites their 'digital shredding policy' which purges customer identifying data. They also warn BDU of potential customer backlash and negative business consequences if they pursue this information, citing BDU's past controversies.

What is BDU's stated purpose for wanting Rare Breed's customer service emails?

BDU claims they need the customer service emails to assess damages and to argue that Rare Breed's own production limitations meant they couldn't satisfy demand, thus negating any lost profits BDU might be liable for in the patent infringement case.

Does BDU intend to make Rare Breed's customer information public?

No, the video clarifies that BDU's request is for the information to be accessible only to the legal counsel involved in the lawsuit, not for public disclosure or direct access by BDU personnel.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Reno May

View all →