The Washington Post Falsely Reported My Video - TheFireArmGuy

Published on January 12, 2017
Duration: 4:14

The video discusses the perceived inaccuracy of a Washington Post article that mischaracterized a suppressed Ruger 10/22 in a bullpup kit as a 'high-powered rifle.' The speaker clarifies that the setup, using weak CCI Quiet .22LR ammunition, is intentionally quiet and not powerful, requiring manual bolt manipulation. The discussion highlights concerns about the NFA process for suppressor ownership and the spread of misinformation by media outlets.

Quick Summary

TheFirearmGuy's video showcases a Ruger 10/22 in a High Tower Armory 9022 bullpup kit, suppressed with a Huntertown Guardian and using weak CCI Quiet .22LR ammunition (710 fps). This setup, requiring manual bolt cycling, was falsely labeled a 'high-powered rifle' by The Washington Post, prompting a discussion on media misinformation and the NFA suppressor process.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: The Quietest 22 Video
  2. 00:07Ruger 10/22 in High Tower Armory 9022 Kit
  3. 00:20CCI Quiet Ammunition and Bolt Cycling
  4. 00:39Huntertown Guardian Suppressor
  5. 00:50Context: Suppressor Deregulation and HPA
  6. 00:59NFA Process for Suppressors
  7. 01:22Anti-Gun Arguments vs. Shooter Safety
  8. 01:53Washington Post Article and Misinformation
  9. 02:04Debunking 'High-Powered Rifle' Claim
  10. 02:39Michael Rosenwald's Reporting
  11. 03:15The Federalist Article by Sha Davis
  12. 03:52MSN.com and Hysteria Creation
  13. 04:05Call to Action: Subscribe and Share

Frequently Asked Questions

What firearm was featured in TheFirearmGuy's video that was misrepresented by The Washington Post?

The video featured a standard-length Ruger 10/22 rifle equipped with a bullpup kit called the High Tower Armory 9022. This setup was inaccurately described as a 'high-powered rifle' by The Washington Post.

What ammunition was used with the suppressed Ruger 10/22, and why was it significant?

The ammunition used was CCI Quiet, a very weak load with a velocity of only 710 feet per second. This low power meant the rifle would not cycle automatically and required manual bolt manipulation to eject casings.

What are the speaker's concerns regarding the NFA process for suppressor ownership?

The speaker finds the NFA process for suppressors tedious and expensive. It involves a $200 tax, four pages of information, passport photos, fingerprints, and a wait time of over 10.5 months for approval or denial.

How did The Washington Post misrepresent the sound of the suppressed firearm?

The Washington Post claimed that even a high-powered rifle with subsonic ammunition sounds like a pellet gun. While the speaker agreed his specific setup sounded like a pellet gun due to weak ammo, he argued this was misleading when applied to genuinely high-powered rifles.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheFirearmGuy

View all →