THIS IS CRAZY!!! California Gun and Ammo Tax Bill AB 1223

This video discusses California Assembly Bill 1223 (AB1223), which proposes an 10-11% tax increase on firearms and ammunition. The creator strongly urges viewers to take action to stop this legislation. The description provides a Reddit link for a call to action, links to the creator's other content platforms (Odysee, SubscribeStar), a P.O. box for mail, and affiliate links for products like concealable body armor, merchandise, pre-workout supplements, and gold investment. The video also promotes joining the USCCA for post-gunfight protection.

This YouTube video discusses an upcoming 6.5% excise tax on firearms and ammunition in Colorado, effective April 1st. It encourages viewers to consider their firearm wish lists before the tax takes effect. The description provides extensive resources for viewers to contact their elected officials, track relevant legislation (specifically mentioning SB3 and amendment L041), and sign up to testify. It also lists contact information for Colorado House Representatives, Senators, and Governor Polis, along with a link to the bill's text and voting record. The video aims to inform gun owners about the new tax and empower them to engage in the legislative process.

This video urges viewers to take immediate action against California's impending 11% excise tax on firearm and ammunition sales, referred to as AB28. It highlights Ashford Armament's efforts to protect gun ownership rights and promotes various sponsors and merchandise that support the channel. The video links to official legislative information on AB28 and a statement from the CRPA outlining their plan to challenge the tax.

This video discusses a significant alert regarding the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and a potential massive expansion of their registry. The core of the alert is tied to a hypothetical scenario where the tax on suppressors is reduced to $0. The description points to external articles and an X (formerly Twitter) account for further information, suggesting a political or legislative discussion related to firearm accessories and government oversight. The content appears to focus on the implications of legislative changes on firearm regulations and data collection.

This video discusses a major lawsuit filed against Colorado's new targeted tax on firearms and ammunition. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, breaks down the legal challenges and discusses how the lawsuit aims to stop these new gun control measures. The content touches on constitutional law, legal precedent from the Supreme Court regarding target taxes, and the importance of understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty. The discussion highlights the potential impact on gun owners and the efforts by gun groups to combat the legislation.

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by major gun rights organizations, including CRPA, FPC, and 2AF, challenging California's new 11% excise tax on firearms. The tax is described as unconstitutional and impacts a fundamental right. The lawsuit is named Jaymes v. Maduros, and the new laws are effective July 1st, 2024. The video also includes promotional links for legal services, gold and silver investments, and merchandise, alongside social media links.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Torcivia v. Suffolk County. The speaker, an authority on Second Amendment litigation, explains how the Second Circuit's ruling allows for warrantless firearm seizures under the 'special needs exception,' despite the Supreme Court's prior decision in Caniglia v. Strom. The denial means this precedent stands, potentially impacting future firearm rights cases.

This expert analysis from Armed Scholar details the Supreme Court's 5-4 emergency order concerning Texas's border dispute with the Biden administration. The ruling allows federal agents to cut concertina wire while the case proceeds, impacting Texas's claim to a constitutional right of self-defense against invasion. The case is remanded for further factual development.

The Supreme Court denied a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA), which aimed to prevent state agents from enforcing federal gun laws deemed unconstitutional. The 8-1 decision, with Justice Thomas dissenting, leaves the future of SAPA uncertain, though a statement from Justices Gorsuch and Alito suggests private enforcement mechanisms might still be viable. This ruling has significant implications for state-level attempts to counter federal firearm regulations.

This video details a critical U.S. Supreme Court emergency election order concerning Pennsylvania's handling of provisional ballots. The Supreme Court denied an emergency request to stay a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that mandated the counting of provisional ballots for voters whose mail-in ballots were deemed invalid. The RNC argued this usurped the state legislature's role and constituted impermissible 'ballot curing.' Justice Alito's opinion noted the limited scope of the lower court's judgment.