Videos tagged with San Jose Ordinance

This video discusses new laws in states like Washington, California, and Illinois that mandate gun stores record audio and video of firearm purchases. The speaker argues this is an overreach and a potential infringement on Second Amendment rights, even though most stores already have cameras. The recordings are typically saved for 60-90 days.

Several states and cities are implementing laws requiring gun stores to record audio and video of firearm transactions. Washington state mandates filming and audio recording of all gun purchases, with recordings saved for 60 days. California requires video recording for 90 days, while San Jose and Illinois mandate both video and audio. New York requires video recording in gun purchasing areas. These measures are intended to combat straw purchases but are viewed by some as an overreach and a threat to Second Amendment rights.

Several US states and cities are now mandating video and audio recording of all firearm purchases. Washington state requires recordings to be saved for 60 days, while California and Illinois mandate 90-day retention. This is seen by some as an overreach and a potential infringement on Second Amendment rights, though proponents argue it aids in preventing straw purchases and other crimes.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the legal strategy of imposing commercial and financial barriers to restrict Second Amendment rights, exemplified by San Jose's firearm liability insurance ordinance. The analysis details the legal precedent of 19th-century surety laws used to justify the ordinance and warns of a potential 'slippery slope' leading to unaffordable gun ownership nationwide.

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has filed a lawsuit against the city of San Jose, California, challenging an ordinance that mandates gun owners purchase liability insurance and pay fees to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The FPC argues this ordinance violates both the First and Second Amendments by imposing unconstitutional financial burdens and forcing association with city-chosen anti-gun organizations. The lawsuit highlights that such measures punish law-abiding citizens without deterring criminals.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the emerging trend of 'privatized gun control,' where anti-gun advocates are pushing for measures like gun taxes and mandatory liability insurance, exemplified by a San Jose city council ordinance. While a similar statewide bill in California (AB 1223) was defeated, the speaker warns that these tactics are likely to spread to other states. The video highlights the legal challenges faced by such ordinances, likening them to poll taxes, and emphasizes the importance of citizen engagement with legislators to protect Second Amendment rights.

This video provides an expert analysis of a new ordinance passed in San Jose, California, which mandates gun owners obtain liability insurance and pay an annual tax. The speaker, a Second Amendment Attorney, details the ordinance's requirements, exemptions, and enforcement penalties. He also discusses the NAGR lawsuit challenging the ordinance on constitutional grounds, including alleged violations of the Second, Fourteenth, and First Amendments, as well as state preemption.

This video discusses new regulations in San Jose, California, requiring gun stores to maintain video and audio recordings of all firearm and ammunition transactions for 30 days, accessible to law enforcement. It also highlights the prohibition of home-based FFL transactions. Additionally, the video urges opposition to AB 1223, a proposed excise tax on firearms and ammunition sales in California, arguing it will ultimately increase costs for consumers.