Videos tagged with New York Law

This video discusses a New York lawsuit against Mean Arms concerning their removable magazine lock. The lawsuit's outcome, where Mean Arms was ordered to pay $1.75 million due to providing uninstall instructions, sets a potentially dangerous precedent for firearm compliance device manufacturers. The speaker warns that this could impact other companies and the broader 2A community, drawing parallels to the Remington Arms lawsuit following the Sandy Hook shooting.

This video discusses new laws in states like Washington, California, and Illinois that mandate gun stores record audio and video of firearm purchases. The speaker argues this is an overreach and a potential infringement on Second Amendment rights, even though most stores already have cameras. The recordings are typically saved for 60-90 days.

Several states and cities are implementing laws requiring gun stores to record audio and video of firearm transactions. Washington state mandates filming and audio recording of all gun purchases, with recordings saved for 60 days. California requires video recording for 90 days, while San Jose and Illinois mandate both video and audio. New York requires video recording in gun purchasing areas. These measures are intended to combat straw purchases but are viewed by some as an overreach and a threat to Second Amendment rights.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the critical Supreme Court case National Shooting Sports Foundation, et. al. v. Letitia James. It explains how New York's General Business Law §898 and Penal Code §240.45 attempt to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shields the firearms industry from certain lawsuits. The expert analysis highlights the legal arguments concerning the PLCAA's predicate exception and the potential for states to nullify federal law, emphasizing the importance of the Supremacy Clause.

This entry details the legal case against Mean Arms regarding their MA-Lock AR-15 magazine locking device. It explains how the device was intended to comply with New York's assault weapon ban but was allegedly easily bypassed. The settlement highlights the legal risks accessory manufacturers face, particularly concerning 'deceptive marketing' claims in states with strict firearm laws. The information is presented from the perspective of a firearms instructor analyzing the legal and technical aspects of compliance.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a concerning case where an Orlando resident faces 71 felony gun charges in New York, despite never having visited the state. Speaker Jared Yanis critically analyzes the escalation from a civil lawsuit by NY AG Letitia James to criminal charges, highlighting the seizure of assets and the potential for this to set a dangerous precedent for gun owners and interstate commerce. The segment also features a promotion for Attorneys on Retainer, specializing in self-defense cases.

This video critiques the current state of urban safety and legal systems, highlighting instances where individuals face legal repercussions for self-defense while repeat offenders are released. It argues that policies prioritizing 'equity' over accountability lead to a breakdown in public safety, effectively nullifying Second Amendment rights by punishing lawful gun ownership and use. The speaker emphasizes the need for a system that holds criminals accountable and allows citizens to defend themselves without fear of prosecution.

Several US states and cities are now mandating video and audio recording of all firearm purchases. Washington state requires recordings to be saved for 60 days, while California and Illinois mandate 90-day retention. This is seen by some as an overreach and a potential infringement on Second Amendment rights, though proponents argue it aids in preventing straw purchases and other crimes.

This video discusses the US Court of Appeals decision upholding a civil jury verdict against Donald Trump in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll. It details the allegations of sexual abuse and defamation, the $5 million awarded, and Trump's appeal based on evidentiary errors. The explanation focuses on Federal Rule of Evidence 415, which allows evidence of prior sexual misconduct in civil cases involving sexual assault, and the impact of New York's Adult Survivors Act on the statute of limitations.

This video discusses the legal ramifications for a New York bodega worker who shot an armed robber. Despite claims of self-defense and finding the firearm in a trash can, the worker was charged with illegal gun possession, not attempted murder. The case highlights the challenges faced by business owners in New York when defending themselves against violent crime.

A New York state law banning the purchase and possession of body armor has been challenged in court. The plaintiffs argue the ban violates the Second Amendment, citing historical precedent and the defensive nature of body armor. A recent court order denied New York's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed and signaling potential judicial agreement with the plaintiffs' arguments.

This video discusses a New York Supreme Court Justice's ruling declaring the state's 'Red Flag Laws' unconstitutional. Host Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, explains how the law violated due process and the Second Amendment by allowing firearm seizure without a prior hearing. The ruling emphasizes that gun rights deserve the same protections as other fundamental liberties.