This Week in Guns 6/17/2025: Rare Breed's Aggression May Harm Them, Mexico Loses, and Gun Group Lies

Published on June 17, 2025
Duration: 48:40

This episode of 'This Week in Guns' by Fudd Busters delves into several critical legal and regulatory issues impacting the firearms community. It scrutinizes the aggressive patent enforcement tactics of Rare Breed, the legal ramifications of the FRT settlement, and the ongoing debate surrounding assault weapon bans. The discussion also covers the Supreme Court's ruling in the Mexico v. Smith & Wesson case and the federal government's amicus brief in the Illinois assault weapons ban case, offering expert commentary on their implications for Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court's ruling in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson upheld the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), preventing Mexico's lawsuit against the firearm manufacturer. This decision affirmed the legal shield protecting the firearms industry from certain liability claims.

Chapters

  1. 00:05:00Introduction & Rare Breed FRT Update
  2. 01:11:00Rare Breed's Aggressive Patent Enforcement
  3. 03:07:00Rare Breed's Patents & Legal Strategy
  4. 07:07:00NAGR & FRT Settlement Challenges
  5. 08:32:00States Sue to Enjoin FRT Settlement
  6. 13:11:00The 'Week of the Grift': Pin & Weld Misinformation
  7. 14:09:00GOA FOIA & ATF Determination Letter Analysis
  8. 17:40:00Defining 'Permanently Affixed' Muzzle Devices
  9. 22:22:00MA F Corporation Product Showcase
  10. 25:10:00Supreme Court: Mexico v. Smith & Wesson Ruling
  11. 26:09:00Common Use Test & AR-15 Status
  12. 31:10:00Supreme Court Delays Hardware Ban Cases
  13. 35:53:00Lower Courts Ignoring Heller's Common Use Test
  14. 38:31:00US Government Amicus Brief in Illinois AWB Case
  15. 41:14:00US Government Brief: Argument Headers
  16. 43:30:00Understanding Amicus Briefs
  17. 47:05:00Conclusion & Upcoming Content

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current status of Rare Breed's FRT settlement?

The FRT settlement is considered 'unenforceable' by the speakers, facing legal challenges from anti-gun states aiming to enjoin it. This highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding such agreements and potential for ongoing litigation.

How did the Supreme Court rule in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson?

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), preventing Mexico's lawsuit against Smith & Wesson from proceeding. This decision affirmed the shield protecting firearm manufacturers from certain liability claims.

What is the 'common use' test for Second Amendment rights?

The 'common use' test, as interpreted by some courts, requires firearms to be widely owned and frequently used in lawful self-defense scenarios, not just owned. This standard is difficult to meet and has been subject to varied interpretations by lower courts.

What was the significance of the US government's amicus brief in the Illinois AWB case?

The US government's amicus brief argued that AR-15s and similar firearms are protected by the Second Amendment and are in common use for lawful purposes. This filing supports the challenge against the Illinois assault weapons ban, offering a federal perspective.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Fudd Busters

View all →