Update on California Ammunition Laws for Jan 1 2018

Buying ammunition online creates a comprehensive digital trail encompassing IP addresses, device information, purchase history, and shipping details. This data is retained by retailers, payment processors, shipping carriers, and potentially shared with government agencies through systems like FinCEN's Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). State-level regulations in places like California and New York further mandate the recording of ammunition purchases, creating extensive government databases. This information can be queried by law enforcement for investigations without requiring a warrant, raising significant privacy concerns for consumers.

This video discusses the "Ammogeddon" in California, specifically the impact of new anti-ammunition regulations taking effect January 1st, 2018. The primary issue is the requirement for ammunition vendors to obtain a license from the California Department of Justice (DOJ). Due to delays in the DOJ processing applications, many vendors, including large retailers and online sellers, are expected to be unable to sell ammunition by the deadline. This creates a de facto ammunition ban for many Californians, forcing them to rely on FFLs for transfers, which may incur additional fees.

This video discusses a significant legal victory in Rhode v. Bonta, where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled California's ammunition background check scheme unconstitutional. The ruling affirms a previous district court decision, finding the law facially violates the Second Amendment. The case is expected to proceed to an en banc review by the Ninth Circuit.

This video discusses the legal landscape surrounding ammunition purchases in California, specifically focusing on a law that requires background checks and prohibits direct-to-home shipping. Ammunition Depot is involved in a lawsuit challenging this law, aiming to restore online purchasing rights for Californians. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of such legislation and the importance of making voices heard through voting and advocacy.

This video provides a detailed update on California's evolving ammunition laws, focusing on Senate Bill 1235 and potential changes from Gavin Newsom's proposition. It clarifies that reloading components are not currently restricted but warns of future legislative attempts. The content covers new licensing requirements for ammunition vendors, background checks for purchasers, restrictions on private sales and importation, and the potential creation of a black market for ammunition due to these regulations. The speaker, Joel Persinger, emphasizes the importance of understanding these laws to protect Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses recent legislative changes in several US states that mandate the electronic tracking of ammunition purchases. Specifically, New Jersey, California, and New York are highlighted for their laws requiring the recording of buyer information, type, and quantity of ammunition sold. Other states like Connecticut, Illinois, and Massachusetts are mentioned for requiring firearm permits for ammunition purchases.

This video features an expert assessment of a Second Amendment audit conducted in Edmond, Oklahoma, using an AR-style pistol. The content highlights a critical lack of training among law enforcement regarding the legal distinctions between AR pistols with stabilizing braces and Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs), as evidenced by the confrontation with multiple officers. The expert emphasizes the potential risks and resource diversions associated with such audits, even when conducted legally.

This entry details a California DOJ firearm confiscation incident involving AR-15 pistols and 80% lower receivers. It highlights the importance of understanding California's complex firearm laws, particularly regarding registration deadlines and 'assault weapon' definitions. The analysis, provided by Joel Persinger of GunGuyTV, emphasizes the need for caution when interacting with law enforcement about firearm compliance and advises against displaying potentially problematic firearms on social media.

Joel Pursley of GunGuyTV provides expert guidance on legally avoiding AR-15 registration in California by making the rifle 'featureless'. He details the necessary modifications: replacing the adjustable stock with a straight one, swapping the flash hider for a muzzle brake, and installing a fin grip instead of a pistol grip. Pursley emphasizes that these changes allow owners to comply with state laws without entering their firearm into a government database, thus avoiding potential future restrictions or confiscation.

This video provides a comprehensive guide on navigating the aftermath of a defensive shooting, presented by Joel Persinger, a firearms instructor with personal experience. It outlines four critical levels of defense: tactical, criminal, civil, and emotional, emphasizing proactive legal and psychological preparation. The content is highly relevant for anyone considering or trained in the use of firearms for self-defense.