When DOJ Starts Suing Your State Over Voter Records

Published on December 7, 2025
Duration: 8:53

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details a legal dispute where the DOJ is suing Washington State over its refusal to provide voter roll data. It outlines federal statutes governing voter record maintenance and data provision to the Attorney General, emphasizing the legal consequences of non-compliance. Kirk, identified as the President of Washington Gun Law, demonstrates advanced knowledge of federal election statutes and case law, offering expert insights into this critical Second Amendment issue.

Quick Summary

The DOJ is suing Washington State over voter records to ensure compliance with federal laws like 52 U.S.C. § 20507, which mandates accurate voter roll maintenance. States must provide requested data to the Attorney General under 52 U.S.C. § 20703, with non-compliance leading to criminal offenses and potential legal penalties.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: DOJ Voter Record Dispute
  2. 00:48DOJ Data Requests & Washington's Non-Compliance
  3. 02:04Federal Statutes: Voter Roll Maintenance (52 U.S.C. § 20507)
  4. 03:22Federal Statutes: Record Retention Requirements (52 U.S.C. § 20701)
  5. 04:49Federal Statutes: Data Provision to Attorney General (52 U.S.C. § 20703)
  6. 06:11Legal Precedents vs. Privacy Concerns (In re Gordon)
  7. 07:11Penalties for Non-Compliance
  8. 08:03Conclusion & Legal Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the DOJ suing Washington State over voter records?

The DOJ is suing Washington State because the state refused to comply with federal requests for voter roll data. This data is sought to verify the state's maintenance of accurate voter records, as mandated by federal law.

What federal laws govern voter roll maintenance and data provision?

Key federal laws include 52 U.S.C. § 20507 for voter roll maintenance, 52 U.S.C. § 20701 for record retention (22 months), and 52 U.S.C. § 20703 for mandatory data provision to the U.S. Attorney General upon written demand.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with federal voter record laws?

Failure to comply with these federal statutes is a criminal offense. Continued refusal after a court order can lead to contempt charges and potential incarceration, as highlighted in the analysis of United States v. Steve Hobbs.

How does the law address privacy concerns regarding voter data requests?

While privacy is a concern, legal precedents like In re Gordon (1963) establish that the Attorney General can compel record production with a written demand, balancing privacy against the need for federal oversight of election integrity.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →