Yes, the ATF is Now Coming After the Wide Open Trigger. And What You Should Do.

This video delves into the complex legal landscape surrounding Rarebreed Triggers and its ongoing litigation against various entities in the firearms industry. The speaker, acting as an analyst rather than a legal authority, breaks down the accusations of intellectual property infringement and breach of contract, particularly focusing on the involvement of Big Daddy Unlimited and Performance Triggers Inc. The analysis explores the motivations behind the lawsuits and encourages viewers to form their own conclusions about the 'bad guy' in these disputes.

This video from RTT: Guns & Gear provides an expert-level explanation of the Rare Breed FRT-15 trigger, emphasizing its legal status as a semi-automatic device. The host, demonstrating high authority and expertise, clarifies that the FRT-15 L3 operates legally due to the efforts of Rare Breed and the NAGR, distinguishing it from fully automatic triggers. The content is highly relevant for firearm owners interested in legal trigger upgrades.

This video analyzes the Trump administration's quiet approval of three firearms in 2026 via regulatory shifts and settlement agreements. It covers the Sig Sauer MCX Rattler LT, the Rare Breed FRT-15, and the Biofire Smart Gun, noting the controversial inclusion of smart gun technology. The analysis highlights a selective deregulation of high-capability firearms while promoting smart gun tech, potentially setting precedents for future mandates.

This video by Colion Noir, an expert in firearms law, breaks down the recent ATF pistol brace rule situation. While the specific rule was overturned, the ATF asserts its intent to continue enforcing existing laws like the NFA and GCA against brace-equipped firearms, leveraging legal ambiguity and the slow court system. Gun owners are advised that the legal battle for firearm rights is ongoing.

This video from God Family and Guns highlights six categories of firearms that the ATF is actively targeting for arrests. The speaker, demonstrating an authoritative understanding of current enforcement trends, details specific types of guns and modifications that can lead to legal trouble. Viewers are advised to be aware of these categories to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of a new lawsuit challenging the National Firearms Act (NFA) in the Eastern District of Kentucky. The lawsuit leverages the recent elimination of the $200 tax on suppressors, SBRs, and other NFA-regulated items, arguing that the NFA's constitutional basis as a tax has collapsed. The analysis details the legal strategy, including pre-enforcement challenges and Second Amendment arguments under the Bruen standard, aiming to create a circuit split and prompt Supreme Court review.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.