How Many To Save Your PHONE? *BULLETPROOF Test*

This video features an "insane test" to determine if an axe (machado) is bulletproof, involving a LAPG (likely referring to a brand of tactical gear or a similar entity). While the title doesn't explicitly mention firearms by name, the context of testing an axe against bullets strongly implies firearm use. The experiment is framed as a unique and potentially destructive evaluation, aiming to discover the resilience of a common tool against projectile impact. The use of "insane test" suggests an entertainment-focused approach, likely aimed at viewers interested in durability, impact testing, or unique comparisons.

This video appears to be a "bulletproof test" comparing how many shots it takes to "save" a "cell phone." While the title and description are in Portuguese, the phrase "teste à prova de balas" strongly suggests a ballistic test involving firearms. The core question "Quantos são necessários para SALVAR seu CELULAR?" translates to "How many are needed to SAVE your CELL PHONE?" The implication is that the phone will be shot to test its durability or perhaps to illustrate the stopping power of different firearms or calibers. Given the mention of "bulletproof test," the content is highly likely to involve firearms and ballistic testing.

This ballistic test evaluates the protection offered by a World War I British Brodie helmet against various modern calibers. While it stopped birdshot and .22 LR, it was penetrated by common handgun rounds like .380 Auto and 9mm, as well as intermediate rifle cartridges such as .223 and 7.62x39. A .308 round caused catastrophic damage, highlighting the helmet's inadequacy against contemporary threats.

This video tests the ballistic resistance of Miracle-Gro gardening soil against various firearm calibers, from .22 LR to 7.62x54R. Four bags of soil were used, with results showing that even powerful rifle rounds like the 7.62x54R were stopped within three bags. The test surprisingly indicated the .45 ACP had slightly more penetration than the Mosin Nagant in this specific setup.

This video tests the ballistic resistance of what appears to be a "disco de arremesso" (throwing disc) against various firearm calibers. The description indicates that multiple calibers will be tested, suggesting a comparative ballistic test. The focus is on the disc's ability to withstand gunfire from different ammunition types.

This video tests the ballistic resistance of a fireman's axe against various calibers, culminating in a .50 BMG impact. Handgun rounds (.22 LR, .380 Auto, 9mm) and common rifle rounds (7.62x39, .223) failed to penetrate the axe head. The .50 BMG round, however, successfully breached the axe, demonstrating its extreme power.

This comedic skit humorously emphasizes the critical importance of wearing eye protection at the shooting range. It illustrates a handgun malfunction, specifically a stovepipe, and uses a visual gag with a spent casing to drive home the safety message. The creator showcases tactical gear and a Sig Sauer P365 XL, demonstrating firearm handling in a range environment.

This video tests the penetration capabilities of various calibers, from .22 LR to .50 BMG, against a tree. Surprisingly, even the powerful .50 BMG round failed to penetrate the tree completely, demonstrating the significant stopping power of natural barriers against firearms.

This video explores the hypothetical concept of using a human body as a suppressor, simulating the scenario with ballistic gel. A Derya Arms .22 rifle is fired into a ballistic gel head, with the host noting the shot sounded 'dead silent'. The experiment demonstrates the penetration depth of a .22 LR round through the simulated head.

This test evaluates the ballistic protection of a Belgian M1 steel helmet against various calibers. While it stopped birdshot, .22, and .380 Auto rounds, it failed to defeat 9mm and .223 Remington rounds, indicating it is not suitable for protection against common handgun or rifle threats.