93 - 97 Mazda MX-6 & FORD PROBE GT Intake Manifold and Rear Valve Cover Removal

This video provides a tutorial on installing the V6 intake manifold and servicing the rear valve cover gasket for the 1993-1997 Ford Probe GT and Mazda MX-6. It also notes that the instructions are applicable to the Mazda 626. A link to a removal video for the MX-6 Probe GT is also provided.

This video tests an engine restorer product on a high-mileage 1997 Ford Probe GT with a 2.5 V6 engine experiencing low compression. The product claims to repair scratched cylinder walls and rings using a metal binding agent. Despite the test, no increase in compression was observed. The description suggests this might be due to issues other than cylinder walls/rings, such as burnt valves or valve seals.

This video showcases a Ford Probe GT experiencing high RPMs, specifically reaching over 7000 rpm and up to 7700 rpm. The description highlights pushing the 2.5L V6 engine to its limits.

This video provides a DIY guide on how to replace and install the distributor cap and rotor for Ford Probe, Mazda 626, and Mazda MX6/MX-6 models equipped with the 2.5 KLDE V6 engine. It demonstrates the removal and installation process, offering a practical tutorial for car owners looking to perform this maintenance themselves.

This video documents the final journey of a Ford Probe GT as it is taken to a scrapyard. The title and description clearly indicate the car is being decommissioned and sent for recycling.

This video appears to be a lighthearted and humorous take on a car chase scenario, pitting a high-performance motorcycle, the Suzuki Hayabusa, against a less performance-oriented car, the Ford Probe GT. The title and description suggest a humorous attempt at a chase, with the uploader acknowledging the likely disparity in speed and the playful nature of the encounter. It's unlikely to feature firearms directly, focusing instead on the vehicles and the dynamic between them.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.