Practical Shooting After Dark EP 153

Published on July 1, 2021
Duration: 29:09

This episode of Practical Shooting After Dark features a discussion of recent competition experiences, focusing on match recaps and stage design principles. The hosts analyze various stages from recent matches, highlighting effective strategies for target engagement, movement, and overall stage planning. They also delve into the nuances of stage design, emphasizing the importance of creating challenging yet fair scenarios that test a shooter's skills across different divisions.

Quick Summary

Making up missed shots in competitive shooting, particularly in minor divisions, is generally discouraged as it's rarely mathematically beneficial and can foster bad habits. The optimal approach is to focus on accuracy with the first shot. If a miss occurs, a makeup shot should be taken immediately without deliberation.

Chapters

  1. 00:05Intro & Banter
  2. 00:30Welcome to Practical Shooting After Dark
  3. 01:15Match Recaps: Rocky Mountain 300 & Ohio State
  4. 02:19Ohio State Match Analysis
  5. 02:34Kentucky State Match Discussion
  6. 04:11Stage 11 Breakdown
  7. 05:01Stage Design Philosophy
  8. 07:02Fundamentals Stages
  9. 07:50Kentucky State Match Verdict
  10. 09:06Cornhusker Classic Match Discussion
  11. 10:01Cornhusker Classic Stage Design
  12. 13:42Cornhusker Classic Steel Stage
  13. 16:30Favorite Match Discussion
  14. 17:35Joel's Role in Cornhusker Setup
  15. 18:34Stage 10 Review & Adjustments
  16. 20:34Stage 10 Target Count Discussion
  17. 21:20Value of Fresh Eyes in Setup
  18. 22:26Making Up Shots in Matches
  19. 23:18The Math vs. Behavior of Makeup Shots
  20. 24:15Rule for Major/Minor Divisions
  21. 25:26When is Making Up Shots Bad?
  22. 27:30Concluding Thoughts on Makeup Shots
  23. 27:40Observed Makeup Shot Scenario
  24. 29:02Listener Questions & Outro

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key takeaways from the Kentucky State match regarding stage design?

The Kentucky State match featured a variety of stages, including high hit factor challenges and those with difficult elements like swingers and long-range shots. Notably, stage design allowed shooters to choose their difficulty, offering options for static shooting at 25 yards or incorporating movement for closer engagements, testing shooter preference and skill.

What is the general advice regarding making up missed shots (charlies) in competitive shooting?

The consensus is that making up missed shots, especially in minor divisions, is rarely beneficial mathematically and can lead to poor habits. The focus should be on making the first shot count. If a shot is a clear miss, a makeup shot should be taken immediately without deliberation.

How can stage designers improve the integrity of their stages?

Experienced competitors can provide valuable feedback after initial setup. By reviewing stages with a fresh perspective, they can identify 'magic spots' or unintended exploits, allowing directors to make adjustments that enhance the stage's challenge and fairness across different divisions.

What was the philosophy behind the stage design at the Cornhusker Classic?

The Cornhusker Classic focused on efficiency, with stages designed to precisely test the intended skills without extraneous elements. This meant avoiding unnecessary targets or excessive round counts, ensuring each stage served a specific purpose in evaluating the shooter's abilities.

More Range & Competition Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →